American Journal of Law & Medicine 33 (2&3):433-456 (2007)
AbstractPain is a fundamentally subjective experience. We have uniquely direct access to our own pain but can only make rough inferences about the pain of others. Nevertheless, such inferences are made all the time by doctors, insurers, judges, juries, and administrative agencies. Advances in brain imaging may someday improve our pain assessments by bolstering the claims of those genuinely experiencing pain while impugning the claims of those who are faking or exaggerating symptoms. These possibilities raise concerns about the privacy of our pain. I suggest that while the use of neuroimaging to detect pain implicates significant privacy concerns, our interests in keeping pain private are likely to be weaker than our interests in keeping private certain other subjective experiences that permit more intrusive inferences about our thoughts and character.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
No references found.
Citations of this work
On the Relevance of Neuroscience to Criminal Responsibility.Nicole A. Vincent - 2010 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 4 (1):77-98.
Functional Neuroimaging and the Law: Trends and Directions for Future Scholarship.Stacey A. Tovino - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (9):44 – 56.
Neurolaw and Neuroprediction: Potential Promises and Perils.Thomas Nadelhoffer & Walter Sinnott-Armstrong - 2012 - Philosophy Compass 7 (9):631-642.
Neuroscience, Emotional Harm, and Emotional Distress Tort Claims.Betsy J. Grey - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (9):65-67.
The Use of Functional Neuroimaging Technology in the Assessment of Loss and Damages in Tort Law.A. M. Viens - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (9):63-65.
Similar books and articles
The Neuroscience of Pain, and a Neuroethics of Pain Care.James Giordano - 2010 - Neuroethics 3 (1):89-94.
Objective and Subjective Aspects of Pain.Nikola Grahek - 1991 - Philosophical Psychology 4 (2):249-66.
The Meaning of Facial Expressions of Pain Lies in Their Use, Not in Their Reference.Mark D. Sullivan - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (4):472-473.
Pain: Making the Private Experience Public.Robert C. Coghill - 2005 - In Murat Aydede (ed.), Pain: New Essays on its Nature and the Methodology of its Study. Cambridge Ma: Bradford Book/Mit Press.
The Subjective Experience of Pain: Where Expectations Become Reality.Tetsuo Koyama, John G. McHaffie, Paul J. Laurienti & Robert C. Coghill - 2005 - Pnas 102 (36):12950-12955.
On the Supposed Utility of a Folk Theory of Pain.Donald F. Gustafson - 2000 - Brain and Mind 1 (2):223-228.
Pain Perception, Affective Mechanisms, and Conscious Experience.C. Richard Chapman - 2004 - In Thomas Hadjistavropoulos & Kenneth D. Craig (eds.), Pain: Psychological Perspectives. pp. 59-85.