Social Philosophy Today 33:155-171 (2017)

Youjin Kong
Oregon State University
Recently, social and political philosophers have shown increased interest in the ideological nature of ideal theory and the importance of non-ideal theory. Charles Mills, who sparked recent critiques of ideal theory, invokes the notion of “non-idealizing abstractions” and argues that these are helpful when applying non-ideal theory. In contrast, I argue that the notion of non-idealizing abstractions is not a helpful tool for non-ideal theory. I suspect that it pays insufficient attention to the actual power dynamics of oppression, which significantly influence judgments about whose experiences and interests are worth being reflected by an abstraction. Failing to take account of the power differences among the oppressed, what Mills considers non-idealizing abstractions falls into ideology, which cannot reflect the experiences or interests of less-privileged minorities, and only concerns those of more-privileged minorities. I examine cases in which the concept of “patriarchy,” which Mills alleges to be a non-idealizing abstraction, functions as what I refer to as the “Colonialist Concept of Patriarchy” that marginalizes Third World women’s experiences of intersectional oppression. I suggest that a more suitable and less ideological way to apply non-ideal theory should avoid asserting that an abstraction is “non-idealizing” and should, instead, protect “resignifiability” of the abstraction.
Keywords Non-Ideal Theory  Intersectionality  Abstraction  Power Dynamics  Oppression  Ideology  Patriarchy  Third World Women  Resignifiability
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 1543-4044
DOI 10.5840/socphiltoday201771051
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,262
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Is All Abstracting Idealizing?Nicholaos Jones - 2008 - The Reasoner 2 (4):4-5.
Why the Angels Cannot Choose.J. McKenzie Alexander - 2012 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (4):619 - 640.
Convergence and Political Autonomy.Paul Weithman - 2011 - Public Affairs Quarterly 25 (4):327-348.
Race, Ideology, and Ideal Theory.James Boettcher - 2009 - Metaphilosophy 40 (2):237-259.
Liberalism and the Muslim-American Predicament.Saba Fatima - 2014 - Social Theory and Practice 40 (4):591-608.
Ideology as Theory.Natalija Mićunović - 2006 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 2:207-215.


Added to PP index

Total views
60 ( #179,939 of 2,455,634 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
12 ( #54,459 of 2,455,634 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes