Disenchanting the World

Journal of Philosophical Research 29 (February):125-152 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In his book Mind and World, John McDowell grapples with the problem that the world must and yet seemingly cannot constrain our empirical thought. I first argue that McDowell’s proposed solution to the problem throws him onto the horns of his own, intractable dilemma, and thus fails to solve the problem of rational constraint by the world. Next, I will argue that Wilfrid Sellars, in a series of articles written in the 1950s and 1960s, provides the tools to solve the dilemma McDowell sets before us. We will see how, borrowing from Sellars and certain neo-Sellarsians, we can solve the problem of rational constraint by perception without resorting to a McDowellian quasi-enchantment of the world.

Similar books and articles

Discursive and Somatic Intentionality: Merleau-Ponty Contra 'McDowell or Sellars'.Carl B. Sachs - 2014 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 22 (2):199-227.
Anschauung und kritische Subjektivität.David Lauer - 2010 - Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 58 (3):492-498.
McDowell, scepticism, and the 'veil of perception'.David Macarthur - 2003 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (2):175-190.
The Identity of Knower and Known: Sellars’s and McDowell’s Thomisms.John O’Callaghan - 2013 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 87:1-30.


Added to PP

224 (#86,119)

6 months
86 (#47,856)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jeremy Koons
Georgetown University

Citations of this work

Preconceptual intelligibility in perception.Daniel Dwyer - 2013 - Continental Philosophy Review 46 (4):533-553.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references