Sophia 49 (1):15-28 (2010)
This paper critically examines what I call the ‘testing theodicy,’ the widely held idea that natural evil exists in order to test our faith in God. This theodicy appears numerous times in the scriptures of all three Abrahamic faiths. After examining some of these scriptural passages, we will argue that in light of these texts, the notion of faith is best understood as some type of commitment such as trust, loyalty or piety, rather than as merely a belief in God’s existence. After carefully showing the form this theodicy must take, I argue that the testing theodicy suffers from serious difficulties and fails to adequately account for the existence of natural evil
|Keywords||Evil God Religion Test Faith Natural evil|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Does Theism Need a Theodicy?Richard Swinburne - 1988 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 18 (2):287 - 311.
Is the Problem of Evil a Problem for Descartes?Brett Gaul - 2004 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 78:209-220.
God, Evil, and Ethics: A Primer in the Philosophy of Religion.Eric vd Luft - 2004 - Gegensatz Press.
God and Evil: A Unified Theodicy/Theology/Philosophy.David Birnbaum - 1989 - Ktav Pub. House.
Is Theism Capable of Accounting for Any Natural Evil at All?Nick Trakakis - 2005 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 57 (1):35 - 66.
The Problem of Natural Evil I: General Theistic Replies.Luke Gelinas - 2009 - Philosophy Compass 4 (3):533-559.
Added to index2009-12-09
Total downloads101 ( #50,729 of 2,177,955 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #73,516 of 2,177,955 )
How can I increase my downloads?