Authors
Robert Charles Koons
University of Texas at Austin
Logan Paul Gage
Franciscan University of Steubenville
Abstract
Recently, the Intelligent Design (ID) movement has challenged the claim of many in the scientific establishment that nature gives no empirical signs of having been deliberately designed. In particular, ID arguments in biology dispute the notion that neo-Darwinian evolution is the only viable scientific explanation of the origin of biological novelty, arguing that there are telltale signs of the activity of intelligence which can be recognized and studied empirically. In recent years, a number of Catholic philosophers, theologians, and scientists have expressed opposition to ID. Some of these critics claim that there is a conflict between the philosophy of St. Thomas Aquinas and that of the ID movement, and even an affinity between Aquinas’s ideas and theistic Darwinism. We consider six such criticisms and find each wanting.
Keywords Thomas Aquinas  Intelligent Design  Darwinism  Evolution  Thomism
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0065-7638
DOI 10.5840/acpaproc2011858
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

View all 16 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-09-10

Total views
2,156 ( #1,760 of 2,462,316 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
175 ( #3,040 of 2,462,316 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes