- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Using the CABLES Model to Assess and Minimize Risk in Research: Control Group Hazards
Ethics and Behavior 12 (1):75-86 (2002)
Abstract
CABLES is both an acronym and metaphor for conceptualizing research participation risk by considering 6 distinct domains in which risks of harm to research participants may exist: cognitive, affective, biological, legal, economic, and social/cultural. These domains are described and illustrated, along with suggestions for minimizing or eliminating the potential hazards to human participants in biomedical and behavioral science research. Adoption of a thoughtful ethical analysis addressing all 6 CABLES strands in designing research provides a strong protective step toward safeguarding and promoting the well-being of study participants.My notes
Similar books and articles
The Risks, Benefits, and Ethics of Trauma-Focused Research Participation.Sarah L. Bunnell & John-Paul Legerski - 2010 - Ethics and Behavior 20 (6):429-442.
The concept of risk and responsible conduct of research.Eugenijus Gefenas - 2006 - Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (1):75-83.
Limits on risks for healthy volunteers in biomedical research.David B. Resnik - 2012 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 33 (2):137-149.
Between Minimal and Greater Than Minimal Risk: How Research Participants and Oncologists Assess Data-Sharing and the Risk of Re-identification in Genomic Research.Sebastian Schleidgen, Alma Husedzinovic, Dominik Ose, Christoph Schickhardt, Christof von Kalle & Eva C. Winkler - 2019 - Philosophy and Technology 32 (1):39-55.
Setting risk thresholds in biomedical research: lessons from the debate about minimal risk.Annette Rid - 2014 - Monash Bioethics Review 32 (1-2):63-85.
Can informed consent to research be adapted to risk?Danielle Bromwich & Annette Rid - 2015 - Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (7):521-528.
Irb Policies Regarding Finder’s Fees And Role Conflicts In Recruiting Research Participants.Leslie Wolf - 2009 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 31 (1):14-19.
Vulnerability to Natural Hazards.Mark Coeckelbergh - 2016 - In Paolo Gardoni, Colleen Murphy & Arden Rowell (eds.), Risk Analysis of Natural Hazards. Springer. pp. 27-41.
Risk of disclosure of participating in an internet-based HIV behavioural risk study of men who have sex with men.C. M. Khosropour & P. S. Sullivan - 2011 - Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (12):768-769.
Assuming vulnerability: Ethical considerations in a multiple-case study with older suicide attempters.Kate Deuter & Katrina Jaworski - 2017 - Research Ethics 13 (3-4):161-172.
Lessons from Everyday Lives: A Moral Justification for Acute Care Research.Andrew D. McRae & Charles Weijer - unknown
Developing model language for disclosing financial interests to potential clinical research participants.K. P. Weinfurt, J. S. Allsbrook, J. Y. Friedman, M. A. Dinan, M. A. Hall, K. A. Schulman & J. Sugarman - 2006 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 29 (1):1-5.
Monitoring Reportable Events and Unanticipated Problems: The PHAROS and PREDICT Studies of Huntington Disease.Cheryl Erwin, Steven Hersch & Event Monitoring Committee of the Huntington Study Group - 2007 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 29 (3).
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
33 (#459,370)
6 months
3 (#902,269)
2009-01-28
Downloads
33 (#459,370)
6 months
3 (#902,269)
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
The Nazi Doctors and the Nuremberg Code: Human Rights in Human Experimentation.George J. Annas - 1992 - Oxford University Press USA.
Planning Ethically Responsible Research: A Guide for Students and Internal Review Boards.Joan E. Sieber - forthcoming - Ethics.
Through the Community Looking Glass: Reevaluating the Ethical and Policy Implications of Research on Adolescent Risk and Psychopathology.Scyatta A. Wallace & Celia B. Fisher - 2000 - Ethics and Behavior 10 (2):99-118.
Practicing Safer Research Using the Law to Protect the Confidentiality of Sensitive Research Data.Leslie E. Wolf & Bernard Lo - 1999 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 21 (5):4.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6d9b7f7c4c-sqt28 uwo