A Heresy of No Consequence: Duties and Virtues in Medicine and Professionalism

Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 66 (1):179-194 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Abstractabstract:In The Trusted Doctor: Medical Ethics and Professionalism (2020), Rosamond Rhodes presents a new theory of medical ethics based on 16 duties she considers central to medical ethics and professionalism. She asserts that her theory is "bioethical heresy," as it contradicts established "principlism" and "common morality" approaches to ethics in medicine. Rhodes advocates the development of parallelism between clinical and ethical decision-making and a systematic approach that emphasizes duties over principles and rules to facilitate the development of a "doctorly character" among medical decision-makers. Rhodes further asserts that her theory and approach necessitate the cultivation of virtues contained in Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics. But Rhodes's insistence that "medical professionals," not just doctors, are covered by her theory is open to critique, as is her conflation of ethic and morals, especially around the question of the "doctorly character" upon which her duty-based theory hinges. This assessment argues that applicants to medical schools and allied health training programs be screened for specific virtues—honesty, diligence, curiosity, and compassion—to facilitate reinforcement of these pre-professionalized inclinations throughout the habituation processes of medical training. This would increase the probability of turning fear and hope to cure and care via reasoning and affective models performed within an ethical medical framework—even while what this ethical framework should reference remains under debate.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The trusted doctor: medical ethics and professionalism.Rosamond Rhodes - 2020 - New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
The professionalism movement: Can we pause?Delese Wear & Mark G. Kuczewski - 2004 - American Journal of Bioethics 4 (2):1 – 10.
Professionalism's Facets: Ambiguity, Ambivalence, and Nostalgia.E. L. Erde - 2008 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 33 (1):6-26.
Responding to the Call of Professionalism.Mark G. Kuczewski - 2003 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 12 (2):144-145.
Professing clinical medicine in an evolving health care network.James A. Marcum - 2019 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 40 (3):197-215.
Wit is not enough.Why is Professionalism Education Failing - 2006 - In Delese Wear & Julie M. Aultman (eds.), Professionalism in medicine: critical perspectives. New York: Springer.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-03-11

Downloads
5 (#1,344,154)

6 months
2 (#668,348)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references