Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 31 (6):601 – 628 (2006)
AbstractA dispute exists about whether bioethics should become a new discipline with its own methods, competency standards, duties, honored texts, and core curriculum. Unique expertise is a necessary condition for disciplines. Using the current literature, different views about the sort of expertise that might be unique to bioethicists are critically examined to determine if there is an expertise that might meet this requirement. Candidates include analyses of expertise based in "philosophical ethics," "casuistry," "atheoretical or situation ethics," "conventionalist relativism," "institutional guidance," "regulatory guidance and compliance," "political advocacy," "functionalism," and "principlism." None succeed in identifying a unique area of expertise for successful bioethicists that could serve as a basis for making it a new discipline. Rather expertise in bioethics is rooted in many professions, disciplines and fields and best understood as a second-order discipline.
Similar books and articles
Why Moral Philosophers Are Not and Should Not Be Moral Experts.David Archard - 2011 - Bioethics 25 (3):119-127.
The Possibility of Ethical Expertise.Bruce D. Weinstein - 1994 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 15 (1):1-187.
Bioethics as Politics: The Limits of Moral Expertise.Madison Powers - 2005 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 15 (3):305-322.
Law and Bioethics : A Rights-Based Relationship and its Troubling Implications.Daniel Sperling - 2008 - In Michael D. A. Freeman (ed.), Law and Bioethics / Edited by Michael Freeman. Oxford University Press.
Expertise, Wisdom and Moral Philosophers: A Response to Gesang.Christopher Cowley - 2012 - Bioethics 26 (6):337-342.
Making Public Bioethics Sufficiently Public: The Legitimacy and Authority of Bioethics Commissions.Summer Johnson - 2007 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 17 (2):143-152.
The Problem of Pluralistic Expertise: A Wittgensteinian Approach to the Rhetorical Basis of Expertise.Zoltan P. Majdik & William M. Keith - 2011 - Social Epistemology 25 (3):275 - 290.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Structuring a Written Examination to Assess ASBH Health Care Ethics Consultation Core Knowledge Competencies.Bruce D. White, Jane B. Jankowski & Wayne N. Shelton - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics 14 (1):5-17.
Philosophy in the Age of Neoliberalism.Robert Frodeman, Adam Briggle & J. Britt Holbrook - 2012 - Social Epistemology 26 (3-4):311-330.
Casuistry: On a Method of Ethical Judgement in Patient Care.Bernhard Bleyer - 2020 - HEC Forum 32 (3):211-226.
The Medical Humanities: Toward a Renewed Praxis. [REVIEW]Delese Wear - 2009 - Journal of Medical Humanities 30 (4):209-220.
Good and Not so Good Medical Ethics.Rosamond Rhodes - 2015 - Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (1):71-74.
References found in this work
Philosophical Investigations.Ludwig Josef Johann Wittgenstein - 1953 - New York, NY, USA: Wiley-Blackwell.
An Essay Concerning Human Understanding.John Locke - 1689 - London, England: Oxford University Press.