Dementia and dignity: Towards a new method of surrogate decision making
Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 27 (1):65 – 85 (2002)
Abstract
Autonomous decisions are decisions that reflect the self who makes them. Since patients in need of surrogate decision making can no longer enjoy the dignity of being free to express who they are through choice and action, surrogates should strive to, at least, make sure that decisions on behalf of the patient reflects that patient's self. Concepts of the self, then, underlie views about the role autonomy should play in surrogate decision making. Alzheimer's disease (AD) complicates the situation because it is a disease which effects the self and theorists disagree about which aspect of the AD self the decision should reflect. This disagreement has led to a seemingly irresolvable split between those who favor the then self and those who favor the now self. The debate has stalled because while both of these views are attractive, neither seems adequate. That is, neither view is complete because each focuses only on one aspect of a whole self. In this paper, I argue that a good mode of surrogate decision making is one that focuses on the whole self and I offer practical advice concerning how we can begin to think about how such a decision might be made.Author's Profile
DOI
10.1076/jmep.27.1.65.2971
My notes
Similar books and articles
Counterfactual reasoning in surrogate decision making – another look.Mats Johansson & Linus Broström - 2011 - Bioethics 25 (5):244-249.
The Substituted Judgment Standard. Studies on the Ethics of Surrogate Decision Making.Linus Broström - unknown
Turning failures into successes: A methodological shortcoming in empirical research on surrogate accuracy.Mats Johansson & Linus Broström - 2008 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (1):17-26.
Making decisions about life-sustaining medical treatment in patients with dementia.Arthur R. Derse - 1999 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 20 (1):55-67.
Surrogate decision-making: The elderly's familial expectations.Dallas M. High & Howard B. Turner - 1987 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 8 (3).
Reconsidering surrogate decision making: Aristotelianism and confucianism on ideal human relations.Ruiping Fan - 2002 - Philosophy East and West 52 (3):346-372.
Physician-patient relations: No more models.Greg Clarke, Robert T. Hall & Greg Rosencrance - 2004 - American Journal of Bioethics 4 (2):16 – 19.
The not unreasonable standard for assessment of surrogates and surrogate decisions.Rosamond Rhodes & Ian Holzman - 2004 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (4):367-386.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
43 (#274,187)
6 months
1 (#454,876)
2009-01-28
Downloads
43 (#274,187)
6 months
1 (#454,876)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Three Kinds of Decision-Making Capacity for Refusing Medical Interventions.Mark Christopher Navin, Abram L. Brummett & Jason Adam Wasserman - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (11):73-83.
Capacity for Preferences: Respecting Patients with Compromised Decision‐Making.Jason Adam Wasserman & Mark Christopher Navin - 2018 - Hastings Center Report 48 (3):31-39.
The role of vulnerability in Kantian ethics.Paul Formosa - 2014 - In Catriona Mackenzie, Wendy Rogers & Susan Dodds (eds.), Vulnerability: New Essays in Ethics and Feminist Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 88-109.
Capacity for Preferences and Pediatric Assent: Implications for Pediatric Practice.Mark Christopher Navin & Jason Adam Wasserman - 2019 - Hastings Center Report 49 (1):43-51.
Bioethics and Moral Agency: On Autonomy and Moral Responsibility.John Skalko & Mark J. Cherry - 2016 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 41 (5):435-443.