Philosophia Christi 4 (2):558-563 (2002)
| Authors |
|
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) |
| Keywords | Hume miracles |
| Categories | (categorize this paper) |
| DOI | 10.5840/pc20024260 |
| Options |
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Request removal from index
|
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Hume's Abject Failure: The Argument Against Miracles. [REVIEW]Michael P. Levine - 2002 - Hume Studies 28 (1):161-167.
Hume's Abject Failure: The Argument Against Miracles. [REVIEW]Peter Harrison - 2001 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 39 (4):592-594.
Hume’s Abject Failure: The Argument Against Miracles.Richard Swinburne - 2002 - Mind 111 (441):95-99.
Hume's Abject Failure: The Argument Against Miracles. [REVIEW]Robert Sloan Lee - 2003 - Faith and Philosophy 20 (3):379-382.
Of Miracles and Evidential Probability: Hume’s “Abject Failure” Vindicated.William L. Vanderburgh - 2005 - Hume Studies 31 (1):37-61.
Review Of: Hume, Holism, and Miracles; Hume's Abject Failure; A Defense of Hume on Miracles. [REVIEW]Michael Jacovides - 2008 - Philosophical Review 117 (1):142-147.
A Modest Proposal – a Review of John Earman’s Hume’s Abject Failure – the Miracles Argument. [REVIEW]Elliott Sober - 2004 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 68 (2):487 - 494.
A Modest Proposal. [REVIEW]Elliott Sober - 2004 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 68 (2):487-494.
A New Interpretation of Hume's 'Of Miracles'.Chris Slupik - 1995 - Religious Studies 31 (4):517 - 536.
Bayes, Hume, Price, and Miracles.John Earman - 2002 - In Richard Swinburne (ed.), Bayes’s Theorem. Oxford University Press. pp. 91--110.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2018-11-14
Total views
8 ( #964,647 of 2,439,697 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #432,499 of 2,439,697 )
2018-11-14
Total views
8 ( #964,647 of 2,439,697 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #432,499 of 2,439,697 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
