American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 77 (4):567-588 (2003)
In his recent anthology, Intelligent Design Creationism and Its Critics, Robert Pennock continues his attack on what he considers to be the pseudoscience of Intelligent Design Theory. In this critical review, I discuss the main issues in the debate. Although the rhetoric is often heavy and the articles are intentionally stacked against Intelligent Design, there are many interesting topics in the philosophy of science to be found. I conclude that, contra Pennock, there is nothing intrinsically unscientific about Intelligent Design. At this stage, however, it remains more of a provocative idea than a research program. Whether design theorists can bridge this gap is still very much in question. In any case, the debate serves as a modern case study for such classic problems as the nature of scientific explanations, theory change, the demarcation problem, and the role of metaphysical assumptions in the development of science.
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Two Bad Ways to Attack Intelligent Design and Two Good Ones.Jeffrey Koperski - 2008 - Zygon 43 (2):433-449.
Similar books and articles
The Intelligent Design Controversy: Lessons From Psychology and Education.Michael Weisberg - 2006 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10 (2):56-57.
Intelligent Design, Irreducible Complexity, and Minds—a Reply to John Beaudoin.Elliott Sober - 2008 - Faith and Philosophy 25 (4):443-446.
Steve Fuller and Intelligent Design.J. Shearmur - 2010 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 40 (3):433-445.
In Defence of Intelligent Design.William Dembski - 2006 - In Philip Clayton (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Religion and Science. Oxford University Press. pp. 715-731.
Added to index2010-01-15
Total downloads676 ( #1,686 of 2,164,541 )
Recent downloads (6 months)20 ( #17,138 of 2,164,541 )
How can I increase my downloads?