Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2006)
AbstractThe word “model” is highly ambiguous, and there is no uniform terminology used by either scientists or philosophers. Here, a model is considered to be a representation of some object, behavior, or system that one wants to understand. This article presents the most common type of models found in science as well as the different relations—traditionally called “analogies”—between models and between a given model and its subject. Although once considered merely heuristic devices, they are now seen as indispensable to modern science. There are many different types of models used across the scientific disciplines, although there is no uniform terminology to classify them. The most familiar are physical models such as scale replicas of bridges or airplanes. These, like all models, are used because of their “analogies” to the subjects of the models. A scale model airplane has a structural similarity or “material analogy” to the full scale version. This correspondence allows engineers to infer dynamic properties of the airplane based on wind tunnel experiments on the replica. Physical models also include abstract representations which often include idealizations such as frictionless planes and point masses. Another, but completely different type of model, is constituted by sets of equations. These mathematical models were not always deemed legitimate models by philosophers. Model-to-subject and model-to-model relations are described using several different types of analogies: positive, negative, neutral, material, and formal.
Similar books and articles
The Continuous and the Discrete: Ancient Physical Theories From a Contemporary Perspective.Michael J. White - 1992 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Models in Science.Roman Frigg & Stephan Hartmann - 2006 - In Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford.
The technology of analogical models: Irving Fisher's monetary worlds.Mary S. Morgan - 1997 - Philosophy of Science 64 (4):314.
Physical models and fundamental laws: Using one piece of the world to tell about another.Susan G. Sterrett - 2001 - Mind and Society 3 (1):51-66.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
The Cybernetic “General Model Theory”: Unifying Science or Epistemic Change?Barbara E. Hof - 2018 - Perspectives on Science 26 (1):76-96.
Aspectos ontológicos y epistémicos de los procesos económicos basados en expectativas. Hacia una ampliación de la agenda en la filosofía de la economía moderna.Leonardo Ivarola - 2015 - Eidos: Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad Del Norte 23:68-92.
References found in this work
No references found.