The Best-Interests Standard as Threshold, Ideal, and Standard of Reasonableness

Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 22 (3):271-289 (1997)
Abstract
The best-interests standard is a widely used ethical, legal, and social basis for policy and decision-making involving children and other incompetent persons. It is under attack, however, as self-defeating, individualistic, unknowable, vague, dangerous, and open to abuse. The author defends this standard by identifying its employment, first, as a threshold for intervention and judgment (as in child abuse and neglect rulings), second, as an ideal to establish policies or prima facie duties, and, third, as a standard of reasonableness. Criticisms of the best-interests standard are reconsidered after clarifying these different meanings
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/jmp/22.3.271
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 32,607
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 29 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Is Payment a Benefit?Alan Wertheimer - 2013 - Bioethics 27 (2):105-116.
Reasonable Women in the Law.Susan Dimock - 2008 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 11 (2):153-175.
Children and Bioethics: Uses and Abuses of the Best-Interests Standard.L. M. Kopelman - 1997 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 22 (3):213-217.
Added to PP index
2012-04-07

Total downloads
43 ( #138,608 of 2,235,921 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
13 ( #36,012 of 2,235,921 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature