The Best-Interests Standard as Threshold, Ideal, and Standard of Reasonableness

Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 22 (3):271-289 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The best-interests standard is a widely used ethical, legal, and social basis for policy and decision-making involving children and other incompetent persons. It is under attack, however, as self-defeating, individualistic, unknowable, vague, dangerous, and open to abuse. The author defends this standard by identifying its employment, first, as a threshold for intervention and judgment (as in child abuse and neglect rulings), second, as an ideal to establish policies or prima facie duties, and, third, as a standard of reasonableness. Criticisms of the best-interests standard are reconsidered after clarifying these different meanings



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,139

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Is payment a benefit?Alan Wertheimer - 2011 - Bioethics 27 (2):105-116.
Reasonable women in the law.Susan Dimock - 2008 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 11 (2):153-175.
Children and Bioethics: Uses and Abuses of the Best-Interests Standard.L. M. Kopelman - 1997 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 22 (3):213-217.


Added to PP

172 (#107,828)

6 months
25 (#104,703)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?