Zygon 43 (2):433-449 (2008)

Jeffrey Koperski
Saginaw Valley State University
Four arguments are examined in order to assess the state of the Intelligent Design debate. First, critics continually cite the fact that ID proponents have religious motivations. When used as criticism of ID arguments, this is an obvious ad hominem. Nonetheless, philosophers and scientists alike continue to wield such arguments for their rhetorical value. Second, in his expert testimony in the Dover trial, philosopher Robert Pennock used repudiated claims in order to brand ID as a kind of pseudoscience. His arguments hinge on the nature of methodological naturalism as a metatheoretic shaping principle. We examine the use of such principles in science and the history of science. Special attention is given to the demarcation problem. Third, the scientific merits of ID are examined. Critics rightly demand more than promissory notes for ID to move beyond the fringe. Fourth, although methodological naturalism gets a lot of attention, there is another shaping principle to contend with, namely, conservatism. Science, like most disciplines, tends to change in an incremental rather than revolutionary manner. When ID is compared to other non- or quasi-Darwinian proposals, it appears to be a more radical solution than is needed in the face of the anomalies.
Keywords Intelligent Design
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9744.2008.00926.x
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,355
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

From a Logical Point of View.W. V. O. Quine - 1953 - Harvard University Press.
Judgement and Justification.William G. Lycan - 1988 - Cambridge University Press.
Can Biological Teleology Be Naturalized?Mark A. Bedau - 1991 - Journal of Philosophy 88 (11):647-655.

View all 20 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 15 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
672 ( #11,878 of 2,519,576 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #271,332 of 2,519,576 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes