Theism, naturalism, and scientific realism

Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 53 (3):152-166 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Scientific knowledge is not merely a matter of reconciling theories and laws with data and observations. Science presupposes a number of metatheoretic shaping principles in order to judge good methods and theories from bad. Some of these principles are metaphysical (e.g., the uniformity of nature) and some are methodological (e.g., the need for repeatable experiments). While many shaping principles have endured since the scientific revolution, others have changed in response to conceptual pressures both from within science and without. Many of them have theistic roots. For example, the notion that nature conforms to mathematical laws flows directly from the early modern presupposition that there is a divine Lawgiver. This interplay between theism and shaping principles is often unappreciated in discussions about the relation between science and religion. Today, of course, naturalists reject the influence of theism and prefer to do science on their terms. But as Robert Koons and Alvin Plantinga have argued, this is more difficult than is typically assumed. In particular, they argue, metaphysical naturalism is in conflict with several metatheoretic shaping principles, especially explanatory virtues such as simplicity and with scientific realism more broadly. These arguments will be discussed as well as possible responses. In the end, theism is able to provide justification for the philosophical foundations of science that naturalism cannot.

Similar books and articles

Metatheoretic Shaping Principles: Where Science meets Theology.Jeffrey Koperski - 2011 - In William Hasker Thomas Jay Oord & Dean Zimmerman (eds.), God in an Open Universe.
Naturalism and Moral Realism.Michael C. Rea - 2006 - In Thomas M. Crisp, Matthew Davidson & David Vander Laan (eds.), Knowledge and Reality: Essays in Honor of Alvin Plantinga. Dordrecht: Springer. pp. 215-242.
What is this naturalism stuff all about?Robert C. Bishop - 2009 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 29 (2):108-113.
Levin and Ghins on the “no miracle” argument and naturalism.Mario Alai - 2012 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 2 (1):85-110.
Science and Belief in God: Concord, not Conflict.Robert C. Koons - 2003 - In Paul Copan & Paul K. Moser (eds.), The Rationality of Theism. Routledge. pp. 77.
The Best Argument Against God.Graham Robert Oppy - 2013 - New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Science, Confirmation, and the Theistic Hypothesis.Keith Mckendree Parsons - 1986 - Dissertation, Queen's University at Kingston (Canada)
Methodology of Augustinian Science.S. Muhammad-Taqīy Mudarrisī - 2011 - Methodology of Social Sciences and Humanities (69):7-39.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-08-24

Downloads
1,254 (#9,653)

6 months
294 (#7,423)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jeffrey Koperski
Saginaw Valley State University

Citations of this work

A new epistemological case for theism.Christophe de Ray - 2022 - Religious Studies 58 (2):379-400.

Add more citations