Ist die linguistische theorie Des logischen apriori obsolet?


Abstract
The linguistic theory of the logical A Priori: is it obsolete In holistic interpretations, the logical truths are considered as continuous with empirical science: they are revisable, a posteriori, though very near to the centre of our web of belief. In this paper, we consider the merits and demerits of this approach, and we propose that it is necessary to revaluate holistic philosophies of logic. Some arguments are put forward which point in favour of the logical empiricists’ theory of logical truth. We argue (following Hartry Field) that the concept of “correlation between logical facts and logical beliefs” (which is at the heart of the holistic theory) is inconsistent. Finally, we concentrate on the principle of contradiction and argue (following Manley Thompson) that this principle is fundamental for meaning, truth, and thinking. This thesis is derived from considerations on the nature of intentionality.
Keywords Carnap  Hartry Field  logical a priori  ManleyThompson  philosophy of logic  theory of science  principle of contradiction  Prior  A.N  Putnam  Quine
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1023/A:1023243620445
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 44,462
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
20 ( #438,761 of 2,273,192 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #321,436 of 2,273,192 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature