The Epistemic Basing Relation

Dissertation, The Ohio State University (1996)

Abstract
The epistemic basing relation is the relation occurring between a belief and a reason when the reason is the reason for which the belief is held. It marks the distinction between a belief's being justifiable for a person, and the person's being justified in holding the belief. As such, it is an essential component of any complete theory of epistemic justification. ;I survey and evaluate all theories of the basing relation that I am aware of published between 1965 and 1995. These include causal theories, , theories involving pseudo-overdetermination relations , theories involving what a person would appeal to in defense of her beliefs , and doxastic theories , involving an appeal to meta-beliefs. My discussion of these theories includes a detailed analysis of variations of Lehrer's case of the gypsy lawyer which, I show, can be reformulated to pose a decisive objection to causal theories, if not causal analyses, of the basing relation. ;Rejecting all published theories, I present a new kind of causal analysis of the basing relation which I call the causal-doxastic theory. This theory states that a belief is based on a reason if the reason bears an appropriate causal relation to the belief, or, it does not bear such a causal relation, but an appropriate meta-belief is present. A causal analysis of which meta-beliefs are appropriate is given, so as to count as inappropriate rationalizations, mistaken meta-beliefs, etc. In developing the causal-doxastic theory, I present a solution to the problem of deviant causal chains, a discussion of the causal sustaining of beliefs, an account of rejecting reasons, and a partial analysis of showing that one is justified. I then discuss implications of my theory regarding foundationalism, inference, basic and non-basic belief, holistic and linear coherentism, process reliabilism, internalism and externalism, and various closure principles
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 39,711
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Epistemic Impact of the Etiology of Experience.Susanna Siegel - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 162 (3):697-722.
Believing For a Reason.John Turri - 2011 - Erkenntnis 74 (3):383-397.
Defeaters and Disqualifiers.Daniel Muñoz - forthcoming - Mind:fzy043.
The Debasing Demon.J. Schaffer - 2010 - Analysis 70 (2):228-237.
Epistemic Internalism.Bjc Madison - 2010 - Philosophy Compass 5 (10):840-853.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Epistemic Reasons and the Basing Relation.Scott Christopher Hendricks - 2001 - Dissertation, The University of Arizona
Triangulation, Content and the Basing Relation.Hamid Vahid - 2009 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 78 (1):231-250.
The Problem of the Basing Relation.Ian Evans - 2013 - Synthese 190 (14):2943-2957.
The Defense Activation Theory of Epistemic Justification.Kihyeon Kim - 1992 - Dissertation, The University of Arizona
Does Doxastic Justification Have a Basing Requirement?Paul Silva Jr - 2014 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy (2):1-17.
The Epistemology of Belief.Hamid Vahid - 2009 - Palgrave-Macmillan.
Keith Lehrer on the Basing Relation.Hannah Tierney & Nicholas D. Smith - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 161 (1):27-36.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-02-05

Total views
3 ( #1,097,074 of 2,328,173 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #950,624 of 2,328,173 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature