The pragmatic circle

Synthese 165 (3):347 - 357 (2008)
Abstract
Classical Gricean pragmatics is usually conceived as dealing with far-side pragmatics, aimed at computing implicatures. It involves reasoning about why what was said, was said. Near-side pragmatics, on the other hand, is pragmatics in the service of determining, together with the semantical properties of the words used, what was said. But this raises the specter of ‘the pragmatic circle.’ If Gricean pragmatics seeks explanations for why someone said what they did, how can there be Gricean pragmatics on the near-side? Gricean reasoning seems to require what is said to get started. But then if Gricean reasoning is needed to get to what is said, we have a circle.
Keywords Near-side pragmatics  Far-side pragmatics  Reflexive content  Locutionary content  Critical referentialism
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11229-007-9188-3
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 32,564
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Literal Meaning.François Recanati - 2002 - Cambridge University Press.
Demonstratives.David Kaplan - 1989 - In Joseph Almog, John Perry & Howard Wettstein (eds.), Themes From Kaplan. Oxford University Press. pp. 481-563.
Reference and Reflexivity.John Perry - 2001 - Center for the Study of Language and Inf.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Pragmatics and Semantics and Husserl and Derrida.Joshua Kates - 2015 - Philosophy Compass 10 (12):828-840.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
112 ( #51,326 of 2,235,779 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #100,630 of 2,235,779 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature