What externalists should say about dry earth

Journal of Philosophy 103 (10):503-520 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Dry earth seems to its inhabitants (our intrinsic duplicates) just as earth seems to us, that is, it seems to them as though there are rivers and lakes and a clear, odorless liquid flowing from their faucets. But, in fact, this is an illusion; there is no such liquid anywhere on the planet. I address two objections to externalism concerning the nature of the concept that is expressed by the word 'water' in the mouths of the inhabitants of dry earth. Gabriel Segal presents a dilemma for the externalist concerning the application conditions of the concept, and Paul Boghossian presents a dilemma for the externalist concerning the complexity of the concept. I show that, in both cases, the externalist may occupy the horn of his choice without departing from either the letter or spirit of externalism.

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
1,077 (#11,610)

6 months
117 (#31,131)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Daniel Z. Korman
University of California at Santa Barbara

Citations of this work

Externalism about mental content.Joe Lau - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Meta-Externalism vs Meta-Internalism in the Study of Reference.Daniel Cohnitz & Jussi Haukioja - 2013 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 91 (3):475-500.
Empty natural kind terms and dry earth.Corine Besson - 2012 - Erkenntnis 76 (3):403-425.

View all 18 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The origins of modal error.George Bealer - 2004 - Dialectica 58 (1):11-42.
Soames on descriptive reference-fixing.Robin Jeshion - 2006 - Philosophical Issues 16 (1):120–140.
Boghossian on empty natural kind concepts.Tom Stoneham - 1999 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 99 (1):119-22.
Privileged access, externalism, and ways of believing.Andrew Cullison - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 136 (3):305-318.

Add more references