Inkeri Koskinen
Tampere University
The paper looks at challenges related to the ideas of integration and knowledge systems in extra-academic transdisciplinarity. Philosophers of science are only starting to pay attention to the increasingly common practice of introducing extra-academic perspectives or engaging extra-academic parties in academic knowledge production. So far the rather scant philosophical discussion on the subject has mainly concentrated on the question whether such engagement is beneficial in science or not. Meanwhile, there is quite a large and growing literature on extra-academic TD, mostly authored by non-philosophers, seeking to develop TD research practices. We examine this literature in the light of recent discussions in pluralist philosophies of science. Some philosophical pluralists see the increase of extra-academic collaboration and participation in science as a potentially positive development. However, certain views promoted in the non-philosophical literature on extra-academic TD appear problematic in the light of the pluralistic discussions. For instance, the literature on TD appears to be overly optimistic with regard to integration, and the notion of knowledge systems used in it is problematic. We believe it would be worthwhile for scientific pluralists sympathetic to the aims of TD to look more closely into the complex settings in which extra-academic collaboration and participation happens in actual TD projects, and to offer constructive criticisms, exploiting insights developed within pluralist philosophy of science.
Keywords Extra-academic transdisciplinarity  Scientific pluralism  Participation  Integration  Knowledge system  Power asymmetries
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s13194-016-0141-5
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,436
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Tacit Dimension. --.Michael Polanyi & Amartya Sen - 1966 - Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
The Fate of Knowledge.Helen E. Longino - 2001 - Princeton University Press.

View all 42 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Pluralism in Economics: Its Critiques and Their Lessons.Claudius Gräbner & Birte Strunk - 2020 - Journal of Economic Methodology 27 (4):311-329.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Ethics, Academic Freedom and Academic Tenure.Richard T. De George - 2003 - Journal of Academic Ethics 1 (1):11-25.
The Continuing Need for Disinterested Research.John Ziman - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (3):397-399.
2.3 Academic Prejudice and the Spirit of Humbleness.Edmund Harriss - forthcoming - Common Knowledge: The Challenge of Transdisciplinarity.
Understanding Tourism as an Academic Community, Study, and/or Discipline.Justin Taillon & Tazim Jamal - 2009 - In David Papineau (ed.), Philosophy. Oxford University Press. pp. 4-20.
About Ethics in Academy.Magdalena Iorga - 2007 - Cultura 4 (1):123-129.


Added to PP index

Total views
49 ( #233,278 of 2,520,378 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #166,910 of 2,520,378 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes