History of Philosophy Quarterly 14 (1):77 - 98 (1997)
There is considerable dispute in the literature as to how much, in Aristotle's universe, living things and artifacts really have in common. To what extent is the relation between form and matter in living things comparable to the relation between form and matter in artifacts? Aristotle no doubt employs artifact-analogies rather frequently in describing the workings of living things. But where does the usefulness of these analogies reach its limits? In this paper, I argue that Aristotle's artifact-analogies are frequently over-extended in such a way that important asymmetries between living things and artifacts are lost in the process. One such asymmetry of crucial importance is the relation between form and matter. Although form and matter in living organisms and artifacts alike are related via hypothetical necessity, it does not apply to both in the same way. I consider particular examples of body-parts and argue that, in each case, a particular kind of matter is picked out by hypothetical necessity. In this way, living things contrast with artifacts which are related via hypothetical necessity only to a disjunction of suitable material; each member of the disjunction is related to the form in question only contingently. In the case of living things, on the other hand, Aristotle is not committed to Multiple Realizability, in contrast to what the functionalist interpretation of Aristotle has claimed.
|Keywords||Aristotle Matter Form Living things Artifacts Multiple Realizability Functionalism Four elements Hypothetical necessity|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Aristotle on Beauty and Goodness in Nature.Christopher V. Mirus - 2012 - International Philosophical Quarterly 52 (1):79-97.
Aristotle on Nature and Living Things Allan Gotthelf (Ed.): Aristotle on Nature and Living Things. Philosophical and Historical Studies Presented to David M. Balme on His Seventieth Birthday. Pp. Xxiii + 410; 1 Plate. Pittsburg, PA and Bristol: Mathesis Publications and Bristol Classical Press, 1985. £27 (Paper, £12.95). [REVIEW]Gordon Haist - 1989 - The Classical Review 39 (01):45-46.
Aristotle on Artifacts: A Metaphysical Puzzle.M. Losonsky - 2001 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 79 (3):445.
Cogs, Dogs, and Robot Frogs.Michael Hector Storck - 2011 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 85:253-264.
Is Artefactualness a Value-Relevant Property of Living Things?Ronald Sandler - 2012 - Synthese 185 (1):89-102.
What is Structural Similarity and is It Greater in Living Things?Keith R. Laws - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):486-487.
Aristotle's Ecological Conception of Living Things and its Significance for Feminist Theory.Wendy Lynne Lee - 2007 - Diametros 14:68-84.
Added to index2011-05-29
Total downloads25 ( #199,041 of 2,153,857 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #119,783 of 2,153,857 )
How can I increase my downloads?