Laws and possibilities

Philosophy of Science 71 (5):719-729 (2004)
The initial part of this paper explores and rejects three standard views of how scientific laws might be systematically connected with physical necessity or possibility. The first concerns laws and their consequences, the second concerns the so‐called counterfactual connection, and the third concerns a possible worlds construction of physical necessity. The remaining part introduces a neglected notion of possibility, and, with the aid of some examples, illustrates the special way in which laws reduce or narrow down possibilities.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1086/421413
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,780
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index

Total downloads
40 ( #142,808 of 2,214,632 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #134,080 of 2,214,632 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature