Philosophy of Science 71 (5):719-729 (2004)
The initial part of this paper explores and rejects three standard views of how scientific laws might be systematically connected with physical necessity or possibility. The first concerns laws and their consequences, the second concerns the so‐called counterfactual connection, and the third concerns a possible worlds construction of physical necessity. The remaining part introduces a neglected notion of possibility, and, with the aid of some examples, illustrates the special way in which laws reduce or narrow down possibilities.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Essentialism and the Necessity of the Laws of Nature.Alice Drewery - 2005 - Synthese 144 (3):381-396.
Constraint, Empowerment, and Guidance: A Conjectural Classification of Laws of Nature.David Hodgson - 2001 - Philosophy 76 (3):341-370.
Finitary and Infinitary Mathematics, the Possibility of Possibilities and the Definition of Probabilities.Matthew J. Donald - unknown -
Laws, Explanation, Governing, and Generation.Barry Ward - 2007 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85 (4):537 – 552.
Ceteris Paribus Laws: Classification and Deconstruction. [REVIEW]Gerhard Schurz - 2002 - Erkenntnis 57 (3):351Ð372.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads35 ( #139,307 of 2,101,766 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #294,699 of 2,101,766 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.