Mental imagery doesn't work like that

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (2):198-200 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This commentary focuses on four major points: (1) “Tacit knowledge” is not a complete explanation for imagery phenomena, if it is an explanation at all. (2) Similarities and dissimilarities between imagery and perception are entirely consistent with the depictive view. (3) Knowledge about the brain is crucial for settling the debate. (4) It is not clear what sort of theory Pylyshyn advocates.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,551

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
54 (#402,626)

6 months
1 (#1,889,689)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

William Thompson
Karolinska Institute

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references