Towards a neo-aristotelian mereology

Dialectica 61 (1):127–159 (2007)
This paper provides a detailed examination of Kit Fine’s sizeable contribution to the development of a neo-Aristotelian alternative to standard mereology; I focus especially on the theory of ‘rigid’ and ‘variable embodiments’, as defended in Fine 1999. Section 2 briefly describes the system I call ‘standard mereology’. Section 3 lays out some of the main principles and consequences of Aristotle’s own mereology, in order to be able to compare Fine’s system with its historical precursor. Section 4 gives an exposition of Fine’s theory of embodiments and goes on to isolate a number of potential concerns to which this account gives rise. In particular, I argue that (i) Fine’s theory threatens to proliferate primitive sui generis relations of parthood and composition, whose characteristics must be stipulatively imposed on them, relative to particular domains; (ii) given its ‘superabundance’ of objects, Fine’s system far outstrips the (arguably) already inflated ontological commitments of standard mereology; and (iii) there is a legitimate question as to why we should consider Fine’s primitive and sui generis relations of parthood and composition to be genuinely mereological at all, given their formal profile. These three objections lead me to conclude that we ought to explore other avenues that preserve the highly desirable, hylomorphic, features of Fine’s mereology, while avoiding its methodological and ontological excesses.
Keywords Kit Fine  Mereology  Neo-Aristotelian metaphysics  Rigid embodiments  Variable embodiments  Mereological composition  Parthood  Hylomorphism
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1746-8361.2006.01075.x
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 25,767
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Parts of Classes.David Lewis - 1991 - Blackwell.
Parts: A Study in Ontology.Peter M. Simons - 1987 - Oxford University Press.
Material Beings.Peter van Inwagen - 1990 - Cornell University Press.
Essence and Modality.Kit Fine - 1994 - Philosophical Perspectives 8:1-16.

View all 29 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Ordinary Objects.Daniel Z. Korman - 2011 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
What Is Classical Mereology?Paul Hovda - 2008 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 38 (1):55 - 82.
The Structure of Objects.Kathrin Koslicki - 2008 - Oxford University Press.
Coincidence and Form.John Divers - 2008 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 82 (1):119-137.
Mereology and Modality.Gabriel Uzquiano - 2014 - In Shieva Kleinschmidt (ed.), Mereology and Location. Oxford University Press. pp. 33-56.
Anti-Symmetry and Non-Extensional Mereology.Aaron J. Cotnoir - 2010 - Philosophical Quarterly 60 (239):396-405.
V.William Bynoe - manuscript

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

150 ( #29,451 of 2,146,897 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

14 ( #48,451 of 2,146,897 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums