Quo vadis, realisme?
 O obecnym stanie sporu o realizm naukowy

Filozofia Nauki 26 (2 [102]):151-164 (2018)

Mateusz Kotowski
Wroclaw Technical University
The article investigates the intuition that both scientific realism and scientific antirealism are turning into degenerating research programs. The evolution of realism in reaction to pessimistic (meta)induction has certainly led to its increased sophistication as it has given rise to various versions of selective realism. However, many current discussions seem either too focused on semantic niceties or are turning into endless quarrels over case-study refutations of particular forms of realism. The point of finding a better understanding of the relations of scientific knowledge to the world seems to get lost in the process. Magnus, Callender, and Saatsi are among those who see the problem. Although drawing on different observations, they agree that the source of the problem is the wholesale approach according to which it is possible to resolve the realism debate in one move, by finding a single universal method of interpreting any scientific theory. Instead, they call for a more modest approach, based on case-by-case analyses. Particularly promising is Saatsi's idea of exemplar realism, according to which realism should be an attitude motivating detailed case studies rather than a specific account of science in general.
Keywords scientific realism
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Replacing Recipe Realism.Juha Saatsi - 2017 - Synthese 194 (9):3233-3244.
Scientific Realism and Antirealism.Iep Author - 2016 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Scientific Realism and Antirealism.Liston Michael - 2016 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Three Paradigms of Scientific Realism: A Truthmaking Account.Jamin Asay - 2013 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 27 (1):1-21.
Scientific Realism.Anjan Chakravartty - 2011 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Extensional Scientific Realism Vs. Intensional Scientific Realism.Seungbae Park - 2016 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 59:46-52.
The Anti-Induction for Scientific Realism.Seungbae Park - 2018 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 95 (3):329-342.
Scientific Realism.Anjan Chakravartty - 2013 - The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.


Added to PP index

Total views
34 ( #251,195 of 2,266,728 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
34 ( #23,799 of 2,266,728 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature