Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):502-503 (2005)
AbstractAlthough Steeles & Belpaeme's (S&B) results may be useful for development of technical devices, their significance for behavioral sciences is very limited. This is because the question the authors asked was “Why do people use similar words in a similar way?” rather than “How can similar words stand for similar experience?” The main problem is not shared word usage, but shared references.
Similar books and articles
Not All Neighborhood Effects Are Created Equal.Rochelle S. Newman - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):343-343.
'You Wouldn't Steal a Car': Intellectual Property and the Language of Theft.Patricia Louise Loughlan - manuscript
Experimental and Theoretical Evidence for a Similar Localization of Words Encoded Through Different Modalities.Sébastien Dubé & Henri Cohen - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (2):285-286.
Language, Thought, and Reality: Selected Writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf.Benjamin Lee Whorf - 1956 - MIT Press.
Vagueness and Truth.Mark Colyvan - 2009 - In Heather Dyke (ed.), From Truth to Reality. Routledge. pp. 29–40..
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Human Consciousness: Where Is It From and What Is It For.Boris Kotchoubey - 2018 - Frontiers in Psychology 9.
References found in this work
No references found.