Meta-Analysis and Conservation Science

Philosophy of Science 89 (5):980-990 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Philosophical work on meta-analysis focuses on biomedical research and revolves around the question: Is meta-analytic evidence the best kind of evidence? By focusing on conservation science rather than biomedical science, I identify further questions and puzzles for meta-analysis and show their importance for the epistemology of meta-analysis.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,486

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Is meta-analysis the platinum standard of evidence?Jacob Stegenga - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 42 (4):497-507.
In defense of meta-analysis.Bennett Holman - 2019 - Synthese 196 (8):3189-3211.
Meta‐analysis or best‐evidence synthesis?H. J. Eysenck - 1995 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 1 (1):29-36.
The meta-learning toolkit needs stronger constraints.Erin Grant - 2024 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 47:e152.
How to Read a Meta-Analysis? A Guideline for Clinicians.Seval Kul - 2018 - European Journal of Therapeutics 24 (1):1-4.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-06-10

Downloads
43 (#552,800)

6 months
10 (#312,841)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Karen Kovaka
University of Pennsylvania

Citations of this work

Data Synthesis for Big Questions: From Animal Tracks to Ecological Models.Rose Trappes - 2024 - Philosophy, Theory, and Practice in Biology 16 (1):4.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references