In Miroslaw Szatkowski (ed.), Ontological Proofs Today. Ontos Verlag. pp. 50--323 (2012)

Srećko Kovač
Institute of Philosophy, Zagreb
After introductory reminder of and comments on Gödel’s ontological proof, we discuss the collapse of modalities, which is provable in Gödel’s ontological system GO. We argue that Gödel’s texts confirm modal collapse as intended consequence of his ontological system. Further, we aim to show that modal collapse properly fits into Gödel’s philosophical views, especially into his ontology of separation and union of force and fact, as well as into his cosmological theory of the nonobjectivity of the lapse of time. As a result, modal collapse should not be conceived in Gödel so much as a deficit, but rather as a kind of the rise of modalities to the “perfect” being. We further show that, in accordance with Gödel’s ontology, the concepts of modality and time should be derived in terms of the “fundamental philosophical concept” of cause. To give an example of how a formalization of such causative Gödelian ontology and ontological proof might look, we propose the transformation of GO into a kind of causally re-interpreted justification logic.
Keywords ontological proof  Gödel  modal collapse  causality  justification
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 52,768
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Some Emendations of Gödel's Ontological Proof.C. Anthony Anderson - 1990 - Faith and Philosophy 7 (3):291-303.
Questioning Gödel's Ontological Proof: Is Truth Positive?Gregor Damschen - 2011 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 3 (1):161-169.
Gödel, Kant, and the Path of a Science.Srećko Kovač - 2008 - Inquiry: Journal of Philosophy 51 (2):147-169.
Lower Bounds for Modal Logics.Pavel Hrubeš - 2007 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 72 (3):941 - 958.
Arithmetic Proof and Open Sentences.Neil Thompson - 2012 - Philosophy Study 2 (1):43-50.
Some Weakened Gödelian Ontological Systems.Srećko Kovač - 2003 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 32 (6):565-588.
Burdens of Proof.James Hardy - 1996 - Journal of Philosophical Research 21:321-330.
The Gödel Paradox and Wittgenstein's Reasons.Francesco Berto - 2009 - Philosophia Mathematica 17 (2):208-219.
On Gödel's Ontological Proof.A. P. Hazen - 1998 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 76 (3):361 – 377.


Added to PP index

Total views
56 ( #168,367 of 2,340,325 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #514,582 of 2,340,325 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes