Artificial Intelligence and Law 4 (3-4):275-296 (1996)

Authors
Abstract
In this paper we explore the thesis that the role of argumentation in practical reasoning in general and legal reasoning in particular is to justify the use of defeasible rules to derive a conclusion in preference to the use of other defeasible rules to derive a conflicting conclusion. The defeasibility of rules is expressed by means of non-provability claims as additional conditions of the rules.We outline an abstract approach to defeasible reasoning and argumentation which includes many existing formalisms, including default logic, extended logic programming, non-monotonic modal logic and auto-epistemic logic, as special cases. We show, in particular, that the admissibility semantics for all these formalisms has a natural argumentation-theoretic interpretation and proof procedure, which seem to correspond well with informal argumentation.
Keywords argumentation  default reasoning  priority
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00118494
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 68,944
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Defeasible Reasoning.John L. Pollock - 1987 - Cognitive Science 11 (4):481-518.
The Pleadings Game.Thomas F. Gordon - 1993 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 2 (4):239-292.
Semantic Considerations on Nonmonotonic Logic.Robert C. Moore - 1985 - Artificial Intelligence 25 (1):75-94.
A Logic for Default Reasoning.Ray Reiter - 1980 - Artificial Intelligence 13 (1-2):81-137.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

On the Problem of Making Autonomous Vehicles Conform to Traffic Law.Henry Prakken - 2017 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 25 (3):341-363.
A Tutorial on Assumption-Based Argumentation.Francesca Toni - 2014 - Argument and Computation 5 (1):89-117.
Formalising Ordinary Legal Disputes: A Case Study. [REVIEW]Henry Prakken - 2008 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 16 (4):333-359.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
36 ( #313,346 of 2,498,128 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #283,501 of 2,498,128 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes