South African Journal of Philosophy 34 (4):441-461 (2015)

Authors
Robert Kowalenko
University of Witwatersrand
Abstract
Explanations of former South African President Thabo Mbeki’s public and private views on the aetiology of the HIV/AIDS epidemic in the country remain partial at best without the recognition that the latter presuppose and imply a postmodernist/postcolonialist philosophy of science that erases the line separating the political from the scientific. Evidence from Mbeki’s public speeches, interviews, and private and anonymous writings suggests that it was postmodernist/postcolonialist theory that inspired him to doubt the “Western” scientific consensus on HIV/AIDS and to implement a public health policy that dragged its feet on full roll-out of antiretroviral therapy, causing thousands of avoidable deaths. A weak reductio ad absurdum allows us to conclude from this premise that postmodernist/postcolonial critique of “Western” science ought to be shunned. A comparative argument from consequences further suggests that in a situation where a misguided health policy has lead to a humanitarian catastrophe, and where postmodernist/postcolonialist critique of science can and has been used to justify this policy, an alternative theory ought to be preferred on which such justification would not be possible. The paper closes with a call for a non-relativist alternative to postmodernist/postcolonialist philosophy of science, and evaluates the potential of recent developments in ‘Studies of Expertise” to yield such.
Keywords Philosophy of Science  Expertise  South African Politics  Postmodernism  Postcolonialism  Public Health Policy  African Renaissance  Thabo Mbeki  HIV/AIDS Policy  Science and Technology Studies
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2015
DOI 10.1080/02580136.2015.1074437
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Two Dogmas of Empiricism.Willard V. O. Quine - 1951 - Philosophical Review 60 (1):20–43.
Two Dogmas of Empiricism.W. Quine - 1951 - [Longmans, Green].
Rethinking Expertise.H. M. Collins & Robert Evans - 2007 - University of Chicago Press.
Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women?Susan Moller Okin (ed.) - 1999 - Princeton University Press.

View all 27 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Public Science and Technology Scholars: Engaging Whom?Erik Fisher - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):607-620.
The Colour of AIDS.Michael Cloete - 2007 - South African Journal of Philosophy 26 (4):388-402.
The Role of Humanities Policy in Public Science.Robert Frodeman - 2005 - Environmental Philosophy 2 (1):5-13.
Why 'Health' is Not a Central Category for Public Health Policy.Stephen John - 2009 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (2):129-143.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-04-30

Total views
501 ( #11,974 of 2,385,661 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
69 ( #9,208 of 2,385,661 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes