AbstractBACKGROUND: The availability of costly safety measures against transfusion-transmissible infections forces Western countries to confront difficult ethical questions. How to decide about implementing such measures? When are such decisions justified? As a preliminary to addressing these questions, we assessed which concerns shape actual donor blood safety policymaking in five Western countries. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Our qualitative study involved determining which issues had been discussed in advisory committee meetings and capturing these issues in general categories. Appropriate documents were identified in collaboration with local decision-making experts in Canada, Germany, the Netherlands, the United States, and the United Kingdom. The introduction of hepatitis B virus nucleic acid testing and selected measures against variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, West Nile virus, and Q-fever were chosen as cases representing decision-making on safety measures with high costs and low or uncertain added safety. RESULTS: A broad inventory of concerns was established, including: 1) nine categories of advantages and disadvantages of candidate safety policies; 2) six kinds of difficulties in assessing risks and forecasting the effects of safety policies; 3) 13 decision-making principles; and 4) six kinds of practical barriers hampering the translation of candidate policies into decisions. CONCLUSION: Blood safety policymaking involves a wide variety of competing concerns, and approaches to reconcile these considerations are themselves contested. Developing a systematic decision-making approach requires ethical reflection on, among others, reasonable costs of safety and the value of transparency in public policy.
Similar books and articles
Ethical issues in patient safety: Implications for nursing management.Mari Kangasniemi, Mojtaba Vaismoradi, Melanie Jasper & Hannele Turunen - 2013 - Nursing Ethics 20 (8):904-916.
Introduction: Moral and Political Issues in Vaccination.James Stacey Taylor - 2014 - HEC Forum 26 (1):1-3.
Meeting consumer concerns for food safety in south korea: The importance of food safety and ethics in a globalizing market. [REVIEW]Renee B. Kim - 2009 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 22 (2):141-152.
Communicating food safety: Ethical issues in risk communication. [REVIEW]Clifford W. Scherer & Napoleon K. Juanillo - 1992 - Agriculture and Human Values 9 (2):17-26.
Safety is more than the antonym of risk.Sven Ove Hansson Niklas MÖller - 2006 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 23 (4):419-432.
Democratizing Decision-Making on Food Safety in the EU: Closing Gaps between Principles of Governance and Practice. [REVIEW]Ariane König - 2007 - Minerva 45 (3):275-294.
Just another reproductive technology? The ethics of human reproductive cloning as an experimental medical procedure.D. Elsner - 2006 - Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (10):596-600.
The livestock revolution, food safety, and small-scale farmers: Why they matter to us all. [REVIEW]David C. Hall, Simeon Ehui & Christopher Delgado - 2004 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 17 (4-5):425-444.
Promoting social responsibility amongst health care users: medical tourists' perspectives on an information sheet regarding ethical concerns in medical tourism.Krystyna Adams, Jeremy Snyder, Valorie A. Crooks & Rory Johnston - 2013 - Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 8:19.
Safety, risk acceptability, and morality.James A. E. Macpherson - 2008 - Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (3):377-390.
Food law, ethics, and food safety regulation: Roles, justifications, and expected limits. [REVIEW]Daniel Sperling - 2010 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 23 (3):267-278.
Choice of nuclear technology and legislative certainty for nuclear safety and liability in Turkey.Raphael J. Heffron & Besim Hatinoglu - unknown
Black Work and White Deaths. Policies for Safety at Work: A Case Study.Alberto Vannucci - 2011 - Polis: Research and studies on Italian society and politics 25 (1):99-116.
On European Food Safety Governance.Jia-Rong Fu & Na Yang - 2008 - Nankai University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 3:10-17.
The Safety of Science Activities in an Inclusive Elementary Classroom.Retha Meier - 2014 - Open Journal of Social Sciences 2:278-288.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Donor blood screening and moral responsibility: how safe should blood be?Marcel Verweij & Koen Kramer - 2018 - Journal of Medical Ethics 44 (3):187-191.
The Precautionary Principle and the Social Institution of Blood Donation.Cristian Timmermann - 2017 - American Journal of Bioethics 17 (3):52-54.
Interpreting and Applying the Precautionary Principle: A Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “The Precautionary Principle and the Tolerability of Blood Transfusion Risks”.Koen Kramer, Hans L. Zaaijer & Marcel F. Verweij - 2017 - American Journal of Bioethics 17 (4):4-6.
References found in this work
No references found.