Are Logical Languages Compositional?

Studia Logica 101 (6):1319-1340 (2013)

Abstract

In this paper I argue that in contrast to natural languages, logical languages typically are not compositional. This does not mean that the meaning of expressions cannot be determined at all using some well-defined set of rules. It only means that the meaning of an expression cannot be determined without looking at its form. If one is serious about the compositionality of a logic, the only possibility I see is to define it via abstraction from a variable free language

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,879

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-09

Downloads
24 (#478,888)

6 months
1 (#386,001)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Semantic Relationism.Kit Fine - 2007 - Blackwell.
A Defence of Arbitrary Objects.Kit Fine & Neil Tennant - 1983 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 57 (1):55 - 89.
Set Theory, Logic and Their Limitations.Moshe Machover - 1996 - Cambridge University Press.
Natural Deduction and Arbitrary Objects.Kit Fine - 1985 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 14 (1):57 - 107.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work

The Grammar of Code Switching.Marcus Kracht & Udo Klein - 2014 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 23 (3):313-329.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles