A note on propositional proof complexity of some Ramsey-type statements

Archive for Mathematical Logic 50 (1-2):245-255 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A Ramsey statement denoted \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${n \longrightarrow (k)^2_2}$$\end{document} says that every undirected graph on n vertices contains either a clique or an independent set of size k. Any such valid statement can be encoded into a valid DNF formula RAM(n, k) of size O(nk) and with terms of size \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${\left(\begin{smallmatrix}k\\2\end{smallmatrix}\right)}$$\end{document}. Let rk be the minimal n for which the statement holds. We prove that RAM(rk, k) requires exponential size constant depth Frege systems, answering a problem of Krishnamurthy and Moll [15]. As a consequence of Pudlák’s work in bounded arithmetic [19] it is known that there are quasi-polynomial size constant depth Frege proofs of RAM(4k, k), but the proof complexity of these formulas in resolution R or in its extension R(log) is unknown. We define two relativizations of the Ramsey statement that still have quasi-polynomial size constant depth Frege proofs but for which we establish exponential lower bound for R.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,139

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The complexity of propositional proofs.Nathan Segerlind - 2007 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 13 (4):417-481.
Bounded arithmetic, propositional logic, and complexity theory.Jan Krajíček - 1995 - New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.
Nonstandard combinatorics.Joram Hirshfeld - 1988 - Studia Logica 47 (3):221 - 232.
Proof in Mathematics: An Introduction.James Franklin - 1996 - Sydney, Australia: Quakers Hill Press.
Ramsey and the notion of arbitrary function.Gabriel Sandu - 2005 - In Maria J. Frapolli Sanz (ed.), F. P. Ramsey. Critical Reassessments. Continuum International Publishing Group. pp. 237-256.
Proofs and computations.Helmut Schwichtenberg - 2011 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by S. S. Wainer.
Propositional logic.Kevin C. Klement - 2004 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
A new proof that analytic sets are Ramsey.Erik Ellentuck - 1974 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 39 (1):163-165.
Implicit Proofs.Jan Krajíček - 2004 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 69 (2):387 - 397.
Provability, complexity, grammars.Lev Dmitrievich Beklemishev - 1999 - Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society. Edited by Mati Reĭnovich Pentus & Nikolai Konstantinovich Vereshchagin.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-27

Downloads
33 (#447,419)

6 months
3 (#760,965)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A mathematical incompleteness in Peano arithmetic.Jeff Paris & Leo Harrington - 1977 - In Jon Barwise & H. Jerome Keisler (eds.), Handbook of Mathematical Logic. North-Holland Pub. Co.. pp. 90--1133.
Bounded arithmetic, propositional logic, and complexity theory.Jan Krajíček - 1995 - New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.
Lifting independence results in bounded arithmetic.Mario Chiari & Jan Krajíček - 1999 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 38 (2):123-138.

View all 7 references / Add more references