Faith and Philosophy 22 (2):211-234 (2005)
The hypothesis of no prime worlds (NPW) holds that for any possible world x that an omnipotent being has the power to actualize, there is a better world, y , that the omnipotent being could have actualized instead of x . NPW is generally deployed to defend theism against the charge that God failed to do his best in actualizing this world. Sometimes this view is deployed to defend theism against the charge that God failed to do better in actualizing this world. These defences are compelling, and, accordingly, critics of theism have developed new anti-theistic arguments on NPW. Most anti-theistic arguments on this view are a posteriori : they typically hold that a God-actualized world would exhibit (or lack) certain features, and that, since the actual world fails (or seemingly fails) to conform to these expectations, it is reasonable to believe that God does not exist. Since most of these arguments appeal to certain claims about evil, they may be treated as versions of the problem of evil. Such arguments are controversial, and the literature surrounding them is vast
|Keywords||Contemporary Philosophy Philosophy and Religion|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
The Anthropic Argument Against the Existence of God.Mark Walker - 2009 - Sophia 48 (4):351 - 378.
Incommensurability, Incomparability, and God's Choice of a World.Klaas J. Kraay - 2011 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 69 (2):91 - 102.
D. Z. Phillips' Problems with Evil and with God.William Hasker - 2007 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 61 (3):151 - 160.
D. Z. Phillips’ Problems with Evil and with God.William Hasker - 2007 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 61 (3):151-160.
Similar books and articles
God and the Hypothesis of No Prime Worlds.Klaas J. Kraay - 2006 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 59 (1):49-68.
Theistic Replies to the A Priori Argument for Atheism.Klaas J. Kraay - 2005 - Philo 8 (1):22-36.
Rowe's New Evidential Argument From Evil: Problems and Prospects. [REVIEW]Nick Trakakis - 2006 - Sophia 45 (1):57-77.
Grounds for Belief in God Aside, Does Evil Make Atheism More Reasonable Than Theism?Daniel Howard-Snyder & Michael Bergmann - 2003 - In Michael Peterson & Raymond Van Arrogan (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Religion. Blackwell. pp. 140--55.
On Rowe's Argument From Particular Horrors.Daniel Howard-Snyder - 2005 - In Kelly Clark (ed.), Readings in Philosophy of Religion. Broadview.
Creation, Actualization and God's Choice Among Possible Worlds.Klaas J. Kraay - 2008 - Philosophy Compass 3 (4):854-872.
Peter Van Inwagen on the Problem of Evil.William L. Rowe - 2008 - Faith and Philosophy 25 (4):425-431.
Theism, Possible Worlds, and the Multiverse.Klaas J. Kraay - 2010 - Philosophical Studies 147 (3):355 - 368.
Reply to Rowe.Daniel Howard-Snyder & Michael Bergmann - 2003 - In Michael Peterson (ed.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Religion. Blackwell.
Can God Choose a World at Random?Klaas J. Kraay - 2009 - In Yujin Nagasawa & Erik J. Wielenberg (eds.), New Waves in Philosophy of Religion. Palgrave-Macmillan.
The Nihilistic Consequences of the Argument From Evil.Robert Lehe - 2009 - International Philosophical Quarterly 49 (4):427-437.
Added to index2009-11-19
Total downloads126 ( #38,830 of 2,177,980 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #317,206 of 2,177,980 )
How can I increase my downloads?