Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (3):907-922 (2016)
Abstract |
Engaging civil society actors as knowledgeable dialogue partners in the development and governance of emerging technologies is a new challenge. The starting point of this paper is the observation that the design and orchestration of current organized interaction events shows limitations, particularly in the articulation of issues and in learning how to address the indeterminacies that go with emerging technologies. This paper uses Dewey’s notion of ‘publics’ and ‘reflective inquiry’ to outline ways of doing better and to develop requirements for a more productive involvement of civil society actors. By studying four novel spaces for interaction in the domain of nanotechnology, this paper examines whether and how elements of Dewey’s thought are visible and under what conditions. One of the main findings is that, in our society, special efforts are needed in order for technology developers and civil society actors to engage in a joint inquiry on emerging nanotechnology. Third persons, like social scientists and philosophers, play a role in this respect in addition to external input such as empirically informed scenarios and somewhat protected spaces.
|
Keywords | Upstream public engagement Dewey Emerging technologies Reflective inquiry Civil society actors Dialogical governance |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | |
DOI | 10.1007/s11948-015-9660-2 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
View all 29 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Reflection as a Deliberative and Distributed Practice: Assessing Neuro-Enhancement Technologies Via Mutual Learning Exercises.Hub Zwart, Jonna Brenninkmeijer, Peter Eduard, Lotte Krabbenborg, Sheena Laursen, Gema Revuelta & Winnie Toonders - 2017 - NanoEthics 11 (2):127-138.
Creating ‘Local Publics’: Responsibility and Involvement in Decision-Making on Technologies with Local Impacts.Udo Pesch, Nicole M. A. Huijts, Gunter Bombaerts, Neelke Doorn & Agnieszka Hunka - 2020 - Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (4):2215-2234.
Editors’ Overview: Experiments, Ethics, and New Technologies.Neelke Doorn, Shannon Spruit & Zoë Robaey - 2016 - Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (3):607-611.
Vida, Vulnerabilidade, Animalidade E Virtudes Em Jonas E MacIntyre: Conversação Torno de Uma Ética Para a Sociedade Tecnológica.Helder Buenos Aires de Carvalho - 2018 - Dissertatio 47 (S7):23-38.
Nanotechnology Governance: From Risk Regulation to Informal Platforms.Antoni Roig - 2018 - NanoEthics 12 (2):115-121.
Similar books and articles
DuPont and Environmental Defense Fund Co-Constructing a Risk Framework for Nanoscale Materials: An Occasion to Reflect on Interaction Processes in a Joint Inquiry. [REVIEW]Lotte Krabbenborg - 2013 - NanoEthics 7 (1):45-54.
Governing Nanotechnology in a Multi-Stakeholder World.Ineke Malsch - 2013 - NanoEthics 7 (2):161-172.
The Just War Theory and the Ethical Governance of Research.Ineke Malsch - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (2):461-486.
Justification and Legitimacy in Global Civil Society.Graham Long - 2008 - Journal of Global Ethics 4 (1):51 – 66.
From Invited to Uninvited Participation (and Back?): Rethinking Civil Society Engagement in Technology Assessment and Development.Peter Wehling - 2012 - Poiesis and Praxis 9 (1-2):43-60.
Civil Society Actors and EU Fundamental Rights Policy: Opportunities and Challenges.Carlo Ruzza - 2014 - Human Rights Review 15 (1):65-81.
Constructing Productive Engagement: Pre-Engagement Tools for Emerging Technologies.Haico te Kulve & Arie Rip - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):699-714.
Reconstructing Civil Society with Intermedia Communities.Aldo de Moor - 2010 - AI and Society 25 (3):279-289.
Ethics and Technology 'in the Making': An Essay on the Challenge of Nanoethics. [REVIEW]Deborah G. Johnson - 2007 - NanoEthics 1 (1):21-30.
Participating Despite Questions: Toward a More Confident Participatory Technology Assessment: Commentary On: “Questioning ‘Participation’: A Critical Appraisal of its Conceptualization in a Flemish Participatory Technology Assessment”. [REVIEW]David H. Guston - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):691-697.
Adam Ferguson on Civil Society: Enlightenment, Community, and the Market.Patricia Diane Nordeen - 2003 - Dissertation, Yale University
Revolutionary, Advocate, Agent, or Authority: Context-Based Assessment of the Democratic Legitimacy of Transnational Civil Society Actors.Christopher L. Pallas - 2010 - Ethics and Global Politics 3 (3):217-238.
The Concept and Feature of the Civil Society.Jian Hu & Chun-shi Dong - 2005 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 35 (2):113-116.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2015-06-04
Total views
31 ( #337,863 of 2,421,640 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #352,281 of 2,421,640 )
2015-06-04
Total views
31 ( #337,863 of 2,421,640 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #352,281 of 2,421,640 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads