Florida Philosophical Review 15 (1):1-18 (2015)

Chris A. Kramer
Santa Barbara City College
In the first part of this paper, I will briefly introduce the concept of incongruity and its relation to humor and seriousness, connecting the ideas of Arthur Schopenhauer and the contemporary work of John Morreall. I will reveal some of the relations between Schopenhauer's notion of "seriousness" and the existentialists such as Jean Paul Sartre, Simone Be Beauvoir, and Lewis Gordon. In section II, I will consider the relationship between playfulness and incongruity, noting the role that enjoyment of incongruity plays in creative, non-dogmatic thinking. In section III, I will critique Morreall's arguments against the efficacy of humor as a means of serious protest, analyzing the complex relationship between the ambiguous terms "seriousness" and "playfulness". In the final section, I contend that Morreall's conception of humor, with which I generally agree, fails to adequately address subversive humor. He is cognizant of the benefits of a humorous attitude and of the work of rebellious groups who use humor, but his insistence that the play mode of humor precludes emotional attachment and practical concern, renders his philosophical analysis of humor far less comprehensive than his title suggests. I will make the case, contra Morreall, and he is the most prominent of many humor theorists who make similar points, that some humor in play mode is non-existentially, non-gravely serious, and intends to do more than simply "delight" audiences; the subversive humorist, in particular, is attempting to disclose and transmit information in such a way as to create change in both attitudes and practical social interactions.
Keywords Humor  Incongruity  Play  Seriousness  Ethics
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Belief and the Basis of Humor.Niall Shanks & Hugh LaFollette - 1993 - American Philosophical Quarterly 30 (4):329-39.
An Existential Philosophy of Humor.Manuel M. Davenport - 1976 - Southwestern Journal of Philosophy 7 (1):169-176.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

An Existentialist Account of the Role of Humor Against Oppression.Chris A. Kramer - 2013 - Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 26 (4).
Humor.Aaron Smuts - 2006 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
The Philosophy of Laughter and Humor.John Morreall (ed.) - 1986 - State University of New York Press.
The Incongruity of Incongruity Theories of Humor.Tomáš Kulka - 2007 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 14 (3):320-333.
The Rejection of Humor in Western Thought.John Morreall - 1989 - Philosophy East and West 39 (3):243-265.
Exploring the Relationship Between Humor and Aesthetic Experience. Gordon - 2012 - Journal of Aesthetic Education 46 (1):111-121.
Disrupting Humor: A Critical Study of Philosophical Theories of Humor.Elizabeth Rucki - 1993 - Dissertation, Queen's University at Kingston (Canada)
Humor and the Virtues.Robert C. Roberts - 1988 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 31 (2):127 – 149.
Humor Appreciation as Function of Religious Dimensions.Vassilis Saroglou - 2002 - Archive for the Psychology of Religion 24 (1):144-153.


Added to PP index

Total views
114 ( #103,827 of 2,517,922 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
19 ( #44,298 of 2,517,922 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes