Models as icons: modeling models in the semiotic framework of Peirce's theory of signs

Synthese 190 (16):3397-3420 (2013)
Björn Kralemann
Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel
In this paper, we try to shed light on the ontological puzzle pertaining to models and to contribute to a better understanding of what models are. Our suggestion is that models should be regarded as a specific kind of signs according to the sign theory put forward by Charles S. Peirce, and, more precisely, as icons, i.e. as signs which are characterized by a similarity relation between sign (model) and object (original). We argue for this (1) by analyzing from a semiotic point of view the representational relation which is characteristic of models. We then corroborate our hypothesis (2) by discussing the conceptual differences between icons, i.e. models, and indexical and symbolic signs and (3) by putting forward a general classification of all icons into three functional subclasses (images, diagrams, and metaphors). Subsequently, we (4) integratively refine our results by resorting to two influential and, as can be shown, complementary philosophy of science approaches to models. This yields the following result: models are determined by a semiotic structure in which a subject intentionally uses an object, i.e. the model, as a sign for another object, i.e. the original, in the context of a chosen theory or language in order to attain a specific end by instituting a representational relation in which the syntactic structure of the model, i.e. its attributes and relations, represents by way of a mapping the properties of the original, which hence are regarded as similar in a relevant manner
Keywords Models  Semantics  Modern logic  Semiotics  Icons  C.S. Peirce
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11229-012-0176-x
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 34,999
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1962 - University of Chicago Press.
Explaining Science: A Cognitive Approach.Ronald N. Giere - 1988 - Philosophical Review 100 (4):653-656.
Two Dogmas of Empiricism.Willard V. O. Quine - 1951 - Philosophical Review 60 (1):20–43.
Models and Fiction.Roman Frigg - 2010 - Synthese 172 (2):251-268.
How Models Are Used to Represent Reality.Ronald N. Giere - 2002 - Philosophy of Science 71 (5):742-752.

View all 26 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

On the Objects and Interpretants of Signs: Comments on T. L. Short's Peirce's Theory of Signs.Risto Hilpinen - 2007 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 43 (4):610 - 618.
On the Objects and Interpretants of Signs: Comments on T. L. Short's.Risto Hilpinen - 2007 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 43 (4).
Peirce's Theory of Signs.Albert Atkin - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Models in Biology.Jay Odenbaugh - 2009 - Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Christianity—Sign Among Signs?Hermann Deuser & Dennis Beach - 1993 - Journal of Speculative Philosophy 7 (4):286 - 297.
C. S. Peirce's Rhetorical Turn.Vincent Colapietro - 2007 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 43 (1):16-52.


Added to PP index

Total downloads
32 ( #193,525 of 2,275,209 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #375,580 of 2,275,209 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature