No Better Reasons: A Reply to Alan Gewirth

Southern Journal of Philosophy 36 (1):131-139 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Alan Gewirth has propounded a moral theory which commits him to the view that prescriptions can appropriately be addressed to people who have neither any moral reasons nor any prudential reasons to follow the prescriptions. We highlight the strangeness of Gewirth's position and then show that it undermines his attempt to come up with a supreme moral principle

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Action and rights: A reply.Alan Gewirth - 1976 - Ethics 86 (4):288-293.
Reply to Danto.Alan Gewirth - 1984 - Social Philosophy and Policy 1 (2):31.
Why agents must claim rights: A reply.Alan Gewirth - 1982 - Journal of Philosophy 79 (7):403-410.
On Rational Agency as the Basis of Moral Equality: Reply to Ben Zeev.Alan Gewirth - 1982 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 12 (4):667 - 671.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
87 (#191,018)

6 months
8 (#342,364)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Matthew Henry Kramer
Cambridge University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references