Stephanie A. Kraft, Mildred K. Cho, Katherine Gillespie, Nina Varsava, Kelly E. Ormond, Benjamin S. Wilfond & Sandra Soo-Jin Lee
American Journal of Bioethics 18 (5):W6-W8 (2018)
Authors | |
Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) |
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | |
DOI | 10.1080/15265161.2018.1461953 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Beyond Consent: Building Trusting Relationships With Diverse Populations in Precision Medicine Research.Stephanie A. Kraft, Mildred K. Cho, Katherine Gillespie, Meghan Halley, Nina Varsava, Kelly E. Ormond, Harold S. Luft, Benjamin S. Wilfond & Sandra Soo-Jin Lee - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (4):3-20.
Learning Is Not Enough: Earning Institutional Trustworthiness Through Knowledge Translation.Stephanie R. Morain, Nancy E. Kass & Ruth R. Faden - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (4):31-34.
Trust, Precision Medicine Research, and Equitable Participation of Underserved Populations.Maya Sabatello, Shawneequa Callier, Nanibaa' A. Garrison & Elizabeth G. Cohn - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (4):34-36.
Misplaced Trust: Building Research Relationships in the Age of Biorepository Networks.Aaron Goldenberg & Kyle Brothers - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (4):21-23.
Including Everyone but Engaging No One? Partnership as a Prerequisite for Trustworthiness.Alexander T. M. Cheung - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (4):55-57.
View all 11 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Mistrust and Inconsistency During COVID-19: Considerations for Resource Allocation Guidelines That Prioritise Healthcare Workers.Alexander T. M. Cheung & Brendan Parent - 2021 - Journal of Medical Ethics 47 (2):73-77.
Truth and Reconciliation of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities: A Case Study of COVID-19.Alice B. Popejoy - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (3):79-83.
An Ethical Case for Dual-Role Consent: Increasing Research Diversity as a Matter of Respect and Justice.Stephanie A. Kraft & Nanibaa’ A. Garrison - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (4):44-46.
Dual-Role Research and Consent by Unique Specialists.Michael Da Silva, Randi Zlotnik Shaul, Christy Simpson & Katherine Boydell - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (4):46-48.
Similar books and articles
Beyond Consent: Building Trusting Relationships With Diverse Populations in Precision Medicine Research.Stephanie A. Kraft, Mildred K. Cho, Katherine Gillespie, Meghan Halley, Nina Varsava, Kelly E. Ormond, Harold S. Luft, Benjamin S. Wilfond & Sandra Soo-Jin Lee - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (4):3-20.
An Unbiased Response to the Open Peer Commentaries on “Does Consent Bias Research?”.Mark A. Rothstein & Abigail B. Shoben - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (4):W1 - W4.
The Role of Patient Perspectives in Clinical Research Ethics and Policy: Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Patient Perspectives on the Learning Health System”.Maureen Kelley, Cyan James, Stephanie Alessi Kraft, Diane Korngiebel, Isabelle Wijangco, Steven Joffe, Mildred K. Cho, Benjamin Wilfond & Sandra Soo-Jin Lee - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics 16 (2):7-9.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “A Decisional Analysis of Consent”.Jonathan Baron - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (3):W51-W53.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Placebo Effects and Informed Consent”.Mark Alfano - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (10):1-3.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Why Consent May Not Be Needed For Organ Procurement”.James Delaney & David B. Hershenov - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (8):1-2.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Informed Consent Revisited: Japan and the US”.Akira Akabayashi & Brian Taylor Slingsby - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (1):W27-W28.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on "Defining the Scope of Implied Consent in the Emergency Department".Mark Graber & Raul Easton - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (12):3-4.
Defining the Scope and Improving the Quality of Clinical Research Ethics Consultation: Response to Open Peer Commentaries About the National Collaborative.Kathryn M. Porter, Marion Danis, Holly A. Taylor, Mildred K. Cho & Benjamin S. Wilfond - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (2):13-15.
Nudging in Context: Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Nudging and Informed Consent”.Shlomo Cohen - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (11):W1 - W6.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Addressing Consent Issues in Donation After Circulatory Determination of Death”.Kim J. Overby, Michael S. Weinstein & Autumn Fiester - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (9):3-5.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Disclosing Individual Genetic Results to Research Participants”: Defining Clinical Utility And Revisiting the Role of Relationships.Vardit Ravitsky & Benjamin S. Wilfond - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (6):W10-W12.
Engaging With a Peer-Proposed, Additional Exploitation Condition: Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Transnational Gestational Surrogacy: Does It Have to Be Exploitative?”.Jeffrey Kirby - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics 14 (5):W1 - W3.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “How to Do Research Fairly in an Unjust World”.Angela J. Ballantyne - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (6):4-6.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “The Case for Evidence-Based Rulemaking”.Benjamin Sachs - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (6):1-3.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2018-04-27
Total views
23 ( #492,550 of 2,505,180 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,705 of 2,505,180 )
2018-04-27
Total views
23 ( #492,550 of 2,505,180 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,705 of 2,505,180 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads