Synthese 192 (4):1173-1197 (2015)

Authors
Jan Albert Van Laar
University of Groningen
Abstract
What if in discussion the critic refuses to recognize an emotionally expressed argument of her interlocutor as an argument, accusing him of having presented no argument at all. In this paper, we shall deal with this reproach, which taken literally amounts to a charge of having committed a fallacy of non-argumentation. As such it is a very strong, if not the ultimate, criticism, which even carries the risk of abandonment of the discussion and can, therefore, not be made without burdening oneself with correspondingly strong obligations. We want to specify the fallacies of non-argumentation and their dialectic, i.e., the proper way to criticize them, the appropriate ways for the arguer to react to such criticism, and the appropriate ways for the critic to follow up on these reactions. Among the types of fallacy of non-argumentation, the emphasis will be on the appeal to popular sentiments . Our aim is to reach, for cases of non-argumentation, a survey of dialectical possibilities. By making the disputants themselves responsible for the place of emotion in their dialogues, we hope to contribute to a further development of the theory of dialectical obligations
Keywords Ad populum  Criticism  Dialogue  Emotion  Fallacy of non-argumentation
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11229-014-0609-9
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 60,842
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Fallacies.C. L. Hamblin - 1970 - Vale Press.
Manifest Rationality.Ralph Johnson - 2000 - Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
Coalescent Argumentation.Michael A. Gilbert - 1995 - Argumentation 9 (5):837-852.

View all 18 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Criticism in Need of Clarification.Jan Albert van Laar - 2014 - Argumentation 28 (4):401-423.
The Ways of Criticism.Erik C. W. Krabbe & Jan Albert van Laar - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (2):199-227.
Dissent in the Midst of Emotional Territory.Linda Carozza - 2007 - Informal Logic 27 (2):197-210.
Poisoning the Well.Douglas Walton - 2006 - Argumentation 20 (3):273-307.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-12-02

Total views
45 ( #231,728 of 2,438,909 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #283,061 of 2,438,909 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes