Argumentation 27 (1):71-87 (2013)

Abstract
Formal dialectic has its roots in ancient dialectic. We can trace this influence in Charles Hamblin’s book on fallacies, in which he introduced his first formal dialectical systems. Earlier, Paul Lorenzen proposed systems of dialogical logic, which were in fact formal dialectical systems avant la lettre, with roles similar to those of the Greek Questioner and Answerer. In order to make a comparison between ancient dialectic and contemporary formal dialectic, I shall formalize part of the Aristotelian procedure for Academic debates. The resulting system will be compared (1) with Van Eemeren and Grootendorst’s system of rules of Critical Discussion (the pragma-dialectical discussion procedure), which must, however, first itself be reconstructed as a formal dialectical system, and (2) with a Hamblin-type system, and (3) a Lorenzen-type system. When drawing comparisons, it will become clear that there is a line to be drawn from Aristotle to formal dialectic and pragma-dialectics, extending to contemporary computational models of argument
Keywords Aristotle  Critical discussion  Formal dialectic  Hamblin-type systems  Lorenzen-type systems  Pragma-dialectics  System CB  Topics
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10503-012-9278-3
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,436
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Argumentation Schemes.Douglas Walton, Chris Reed & Fabrizio Macagno - 2008 - Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Fallacies.Charles Leonard Hamblin - 1970 - London, England: Vale Press.

View all 15 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Formalization of Critical Discussion.Erik Krabbe - 2017 - Argumentation 31 (1):101-119.
Endoxa and Epistemology in Aristotle’s Topics.Joseph Bjelde - 2021 - In Joseph Andrew Bjelde, David Merry & Christopher Roser (eds.), Essays on Argumentation in Antiquity. Cham: Springer. pp. 201-214.
Witness Impeachment in Cross-Examination Using Ad Hominem Argumentation.Douglas Walton - 2018 - Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 55 (1):93-114.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Formal Systems of Dialogue Rules.Erik C. W. Krabbe - 1985 - Synthese 63 (3):295 - 328.
Formal Systems of Dialogue Rules.Erick C. W. Krabbe - 1984 - Synthese 58 (2):295 - 328.
.[author unknown] - unknown
Is There a Burden of Questioning?Douglas Walton - 2003 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 11 (1):1-43.
Pragma-Dialectics and Beyond.Daniel Bonevac - 2003 - Argumentation 17 (4):451-459.
Fractal Images of Formal Systems.Paul St Denis & Patrick Grim - 1997 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 26 (2):181-222.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-09-23

Total views
52 ( #220,150 of 2,520,399 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #405,718 of 2,520,399 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes