Winning and Losing for Arguers


What roles do “winning” and “losing” have to play in argumentative discussions? We say that someone has “won” a discussion or debate, but also an emphasis on “winning” is often rejected. The question is: can these concepts be so interpreted that justice is done to these antagonistic views? Starting from Aristotelian ideas, the paper purports to establish that the views mentioned above can indeed be reconciled.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,168

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Sartrean transcendence: Winning and losing.P. J. Crittenden - 1985 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 63 (4):440 – 450.
Games with 1-backtracking.Stefano Berardi, Thierry Coquand & Susumu Hayashi - 2010 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 161 (10):1254-1269.
Best-of-two contests with psychological effects.Alex Krumer - 2013 - Theory and Decision 75 (1):85-100.
Online CSR reportage of award‐winning versus non award‐winning banks in Ghana.Robert Ebo Hinson - 2011 - Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 9 (2):102-115.
Dialogue Foundations.Wilfrid Hodges & Erik C. W. Krabbe - 2001 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 75:17-49.
Between proof and truth.Julien Boyer & Gabriel Sandu - 2012 - Synthese 187 (3):821-832.
Gurevich-Harrington's games defined by finite automata.Alexander Yakhnis & Vladimir Yakhnis - 1993 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 62 (3):265-294.


Added to PP

22 (#712,004)

6 months
1 (#1,475,915)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Arguments with losers.Andrew Aberdein - 2016 - Florida Philosophical Review 16 (1):1-11.
The Methodological Usefulness of Deep Disagreement.Steven W. Patterson - 2015 - Cogency: Journal of Reasoning and Argumentation 6 (2).

Add more citations

References found in this work

Fallacies.C. L. Hamblin - 1970 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 160:492-492.
From axiom to dialogue: a philosophical study of logics and argumentation.E. M. Barth - 1982 - New York: W. de Gruyter. Edited by E. C. W. Krabbe.
Coalescent argumentation.Michael A. Gilbert - 1995 - Argumentation 9 (5):837-852.

View all 13 references / Add more references