Between the Bounds of experience and divine intuition: Kant's epistemic limits and Hegel's ambitions
Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 50 (3):306 – 334 (2007)
Hegel seeks to overturn Kant's conclusion that our knowledge is restricted, or that we cannot have knowledge of things as they are in themselves. Understanding this Hegelian ambition requires distinguishing two Kantian characterizations of our epistemic limits: First, we can have knowledge only within the "bounds of experience". Second, we cannot have knowledge of objects that would be accessible only to a divine intellectual intuition, even though the faculty of reason requires us to conceive of such objects. Hegel aims to drive a wedge between these two characterizations, showing that we can have knowledge beyond Kant's bounds of experience, yet without need of divine intuition. And attention to such knowledge is supposed to show that we have no legitimate need to even conceive of divine intuition and its objects - and no need to conclude that our own knowledge is restricted by comparison, or that we cannot know things as they are in themselves. I focus here on the initial case Hegel uses to introduce this extended argument strategy: we can have more knowledge of natural kinds and laws than would be allowed by Kant's bounds of experience.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Citations of this work BETA
Moral Obligation After the Death of God: Critical Reflections on Concerns From Immanuel Kant, G.W.F. Hegel, and Elizabeth Anscombe. [REVIEW]H. Tristram Engelhardt Jr - 2010 - In Ellen Frankel Paul, Fred Dycus Miller & Jeffrey Paul (eds.), Social Philosophy and Policy. Cambridge University Press. pp. 317-340.
Knowledge, Freedom and Willing: Hegel on Subjective Spirit.Damion Buterin - 2009 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 52 (1):26 – 52.
Similar books and articles
Some Differences Between Kant's and Husserl's Conceptions of Transcendental Philosophy.Thomas J. Nenon - 2008 - Continental Philosophy Review 41 (4):427-439.
Intuition and Nature in Kant and Goethe.Jennifer Mensch - 2011 - European Journal of Philosophy 19 (3):431-453.
Real Repugnance and Our Ignorance of Things-in-Themselves: A Lockean Problem in Kant and Hegel.Andrew Chignell - 2011 - Internationales Jahrbuch des Deutschen Idealismus 7:135-159.
Hegel's Anticipation of the Early History of Analytic Philosophy.Paul Redding - 2010 - The Owl of Minerva 42 (1–2):18–40.
Can We Acquire Knowledge of Ultimate Reality?Michael V. Antony - forthcoming - In Jeanine Diller & Asa Kasher (eds.), Models of God and Other Ultimate Realities. Springer.
Practical Cognition, Intuition, and the Fact of Reason.Patrick Kain - 2010 - In Benjamin Lipscomb & James Krueger (eds.), Kant's Moral Metaphysics: God, Freedom, and Immortality. de Gruyter. pp. 211--230.
Metaphysical Questions in Sartre's Phenomenological Ontology.Jeffrey Wilson - 2000 - Sartre Studies International 6 (2):46-61.
Satisfying the Demands of Reason: Hegel's Conceptualization of Experience.Simon Lumsden - 2003 - Topoi 22 (1):41-53.
Kant on Geometrical Intuition and the Foundations of Mathematics.Frode Kjosavik - 2009 - Kant-Studien 100 (1):1-27.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads80 ( #65,811 of 2,172,937 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #36,327 of 2,172,937 )
How can I increase my downloads?