Intuitive consequences of the revision theory of truth

Analysis 62 (4):330–336 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,164

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
93 (#177,557)

6 months
7 (#328,545)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Kremer
University of Chicago

Citations of this work

On Artifacts and Truth-Preservation.Shawn Standefer - 2015 - Australasian Journal of Logic 12 (3):135-158.
How to find an attractive solution to the liar paradox.Mark Pinder - 2018 - Philosophical Studies 175 (7):1661-1680.
The rationale behind revision-rule semantics.Lionel Shapiro - 2006 - Philosophical Studies 129 (3):477 - 515.
Still counterintuitive: A reply to Kremer.Roy T. Cook - 2003 - Analysis 63 (3):257–261.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Uber Sinn und Bedeutung.Gottlob Frege - 1892 - Zeitschrift für Philosophie Und Philosophische Kritik 100 (1):25-50.
Ueber Sinn und Bedeutung (Summary).Gottlob Frege - 1892 - Philosophical Review 1 (5):574-575.
Ueber Begriff und Gegenstand.Gottlob Frege - 1892 - Vierteljahrsschrift Für Wissenschaftliche Philosophie 16 (2):192-205.
Translations from the philosophical writings of Gottlob Frege.Gottlob Frege - 1952 - New York,: Philosophical Library. Edited by P. T. Geach & Max Black.

View all 8 references / Add more references