European Journal of Philosophy 17 (4):527-558 (2009)
Consider the laws of nature—the laws of physics, for example. One familiar philosophical question about laws is this: what is it to be a law of nature? More specifically, is a law of nature a regularity, or a generalization stating a regularity? Or is it something else? Another philosophical question is: how, and to what extent, can we have knowledge of the laws of nature? I am interested here in Kant's answers to these questions, and their place within his broader theoretical philosophy during the period spanning from the first to the third Critique.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Kantian Humility: Our Ignorance of Things in Themselves.Rae Langton - 1998 - Oxford University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Rehabilitating the Regulative Use of Reason: Kant on Empirical and Chemical Laws.Michael Bennett McNulty - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 54:1-10.
Similar books and articles
In Defense of Psychological Laws.Martin Carrier - 1998 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 12 (3):217 – 232.
Laws and Lawmakers: Science, Metaphysics, and the Laws of Nature.Marc Lange - 2009 - Oxford University Press.
A Commentary and Review of Montesquieu's Spirit of Laws: Prepared for Press From the Original.de Tracy Destutt & Claude Antoine Louis - 1811 - Lawbook Exchange.
The Ultimate Argument Against Armstrong's Contingent Necessitation View of Laws.Alexander Bird - 2005 - Analysis 65 (286):147-55.
Constraint, Empowerment, and Guidance: A Conjectural Classification of Laws of Nature.David Hodgson - 2001 - Philosophy 76 (3):341-370.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads291 ( #9,741 of 2,146,482 )
Recent downloads (6 months)10 ( #75,284 of 2,146,482 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.