The legality of interrogational torture: A question of proper authorization or a substantive moral issue

Israel Law Review 34 (2):509-559 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The article explores the Israeli Supreme Court main judgment regarding the legality of the use of special interrogation methods in order extract information concerning future acts of terror. The Judgment's main conclusion was that while there might be a justification for using exceptional interrogation measures in order to save lives, based on the concept of lesser evil as embedded in the criminal defense of necessity, the government is nevertheless not authorized to use such means in the absence of explicit legislation to that effect. The article presents and evaluates the Judgment, particularly the relation between the substantive moral questions involved and the aspect of authorization.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,907

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Tragic Choices.Christopher W. Tindale - 2005 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 19 (2):209-222.
Evidence gained from torture: Wishful thinking, checkability, and extreme circumstances.James Franklin - 2009 - Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law 17:281-290.
Tortured Knowledge.Eric M. Rovie - 2009 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 23 (2):315-333.
Torture. How denying Moral Standing violates Human Dignity.Andreas Maier - forthcoming - In Webster Elaine & Kaufmann Paulus (eds.), Violations of Human Dignity. Springer.
The Role of "Legality" in Kant's Moral Philosophy.Koray Tütüncü - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 3:29-34.
For Interrogational Torture.Stephen Kershnar - 2005 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 19 (2):223-241.


Added to PP

71 (#235,899)

6 months
4 (#855,130)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Re'em Segev
Hebrew University of Jerusalem

Citations of this work

Sub-Optimal Justification and Justificatory Defenses.Re’em Segev - 2010 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 4 (1):57-76.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references