Public Reason 6 (1-2):21-34 (2014)
AbstractKant’s non-voluntarist conception of political obligation has led some philosophers to argue that he would reject self-government rights for indigenous peoples. Some recent scholarship suggests, however, that Kant’s critique of colonialism provides an argument in favor of granting self-government rights. Here I argue for a stronger conclusion: Kantian political theory not only can but must include sovereignty for indigenous peoples. Normally these rights are considered redress for historic injustice. On a Kantian view, however, I argue that they are not remedial. Sovereignty rights are a necessary part of establishing perpetual peace. By failing to acknowledge the sovereignty of native groups, states once guilty of imperialism leave open the in principle possibility for future violence, even though no current conflict exists. Only in recognizing self-government rights can states truly commit to the cosmopolitan ideal.
Similar books and articles
Indigenous rights, global governance, and state sovereignty.William H. Meyer - 2012 - Human Rights Review 13 (3):327-347.
Self-determination versus the determination of self: A critical reading of the colonial ethics inherent to the united nations declaration on the rights of indigenous peoples.Mark F. N. Franke - 2007 - Journal of Global Ethics 3 (3):359 – 379.
Rights of Self-delimiting Peoples: Protecting Those Who Want No Part of Us.Lantz Fleming Miller - 2013 - Human Rights Review 14 (1):31-51.
Indigenous rights and environmental justice.Roy W. Perrett - 1998 - Environmental Ethics 20 (4):377-391.
Indigenous rights and the constitution: Making the case for constitutional reform.Megan Jane Davis - unknown
Are There Any Defensible Indigenous Rights?Gillian Brock - 2002 - Contemporary Political Theory 1 (3):285-305.
Ownership, Authority, and Self-Determination: Moral Principles and Indigenous Rights Claims.Burke A. Hendrix - 2008 - Pennsylvania State University Press.
Global Indigenous Research Contexts for Bio-Prospecting: Sacred Collisions of Ethnobotany, Diversity Genetics, Intellectual Property Law, Sovereign Rights, and Public Interest Pharmaceuticals.Anne Waters - 2004 - American Philosophical Association Newsletter on Indigenous Philosophy.
Indigeneity, Self-Determination, and Sovereignty.Anne Schulherr Waters - 2002 - American Philosophical Association Newsletter on American Indians in Philosophy.
Justice and indigenous land rights.Susan Dodds - 1998 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 41 (2):187 – 205.
Indigenous peoples tribal self government: Legal history and public policy manifestations in canada, new zealand and the united states.Michael Lane - unknown
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
No citations found.
References found in this work
Multicultural Citizenship: a Liberal Theory of Minority Rights.Will Kymlicka - 1995 - Philosophical Quarterly 47 (187):250-253.
[Book review] multicultural citizenship, a liberal theory of minority rights. [REVIEW]Will Kymlicka - 1996 - Ethics 107 (1):153-155.
Kant's non-voluntarist conception of political obligations: Why justice is impossible in the state of nature.Helga Varden - 2008 - Kantian Review 13 (2):1-45.