Animal Rights: A Non‐Consequentialist Approach

In K. Petrus & M. Wild (eds.), Animal Minds and Animal Ethics. Transcript (2013)
Abstract
It is a curious fact about mainstream discussions of animal rights that they are dominated by consequentialist defenses thereof, when consequentialism in general has been on the wane in other areas of moral philosophy. In this paper, I describe an alternative, non‐consequentialist ethical framework and argue that it grants animals more expansive rights than consequentialist proponents of animal rights typically grant. The cornerstone of this non‐consequentialist framework is the thought that the virtuous agent is s/he who has the stable and dominating disposition to treat all conscious animals, including non‐human conscious animals, as ends and not mere means
Keywords animal rights  kantian ethics  virtue ethics  animal consciousness
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2011-05-12

Total downloads
434 ( #5,489 of 2,191,821 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
30 ( #5,259 of 2,191,821 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature