Philosophical Issues 20 (1):185-208 (2010)

Authors
Uriah Kriegel
Rice University
Abstract
One of the most enduring elements of Davidson’s legacy is the idea that intentionality is inherently normative. The normativity of intentionality means different things to different people and in different contexts, however. A subsidiary goal of this paper is to get clear on the sense in which Davidson means the thesis that intentionality is inherently normative. The central goal of the paper is to consider whether the thesis is true, in light of recent work on intentionality that insists on an intimate connection between intentionality and phenomenal consciousness. According to several recent authors, there is a kind of intentionality – “phenomenal intentionality” – that is fully constituted by the phenomenal character of conscious experiences. I will argue that although Davidson’s thesis, when correctly understood, is compelling for most intentionality, it is false of phenomenal intentionality. I start, in §1, with an explication of the notion of phenomenal intentionality; in §2, I elucidate Davidson’s thesis and his case for it; in §3, I argue that the case does not extend to phenomenal intentionality; I close, in §4, with some objections and replies.
Keywords intentionality  phenomenal intentionality  intentional ascription  normativity
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1533-6077.2010.00182.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 51,707
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Vison.David Marr - 1982 - W. H. Freeman.
The Varieties of Reference.Gareth Evans - 1982 - Oxford University Press.

View all 55 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Phenomenal Intentionality.Uriah Kriegel (ed.) - 2013 - Oxford University Press.
The Normativity of Meaning and Content.Kathrin Glüer & Asa Wikforss - 2009 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
The Five Marks of the Mental.Tuomas K. Pernu - 2017 - Frontiers in Psychology 8.
The Phenomenology of Kantian Respect for Persons.Uriah Kriegel & Mark Timmons - forthcoming - In R. Dean & O. Sensen (eds.), Respect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-12-02

Total views
394 ( #16,365 of 2,333,200 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #69,750 of 2,333,200 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes