Mind 114 (456):1005-1037 (2005)
AbstractDespite the renown of ‘On Denoting’, much criticism has ignored or misconstrued Russell's treatment of scope, particularly in intensional, but also in extensional contexts. This has been rectified by more recent commentators, yet it remains largely unnoticed that the examples Russell gives of scope distinctions are questionable or inconsistent with his own philosophy. Nevertheless, Russell is right: scope does matter in intensional contexts. In Principia Mathematica, Russell proves a metatheorem to the effect that the scope of a single occurrence of a description in an extensional context does not matter, provided existence and uniqueness conditions are satisfied. But attempts to eliminate descriptions in more complicated cases may produce an analysis with more occurrences of descriptions than featured in the analysand. Taking alternation and negation to be primitive (as in the first edition of Principia), this can be resolved, although the proof is non-trivial. Taking the Sheffer stroke to be primitive (as proposed by Russell in the second edition), with bad choices of scope the analysis fails to terminate
Similar books and articles
Russell's Substitutional Theory of Classes and Relations.Gregory Landini - 1987 - History and Philosophy of Logic 8 (2):171-200.
The Definability of the Set of Natural Numbers in the 1925 Principia Mathematica.Gregory Landini - 1996 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 25 (6):597 - 615.
Ghosts, Murderers, and the Semantics of Descriptions.Anders Johan Schoubye - 2013 - Noûs 47 (3):496-533.
Particulars As Universals: Russell’s Ontological Assay of Particularity and Phenomenological Space-Time.Herbert Hochberg - 1995 - Journal of Philosophical Research 20:83-111.
The Evolution of Principia Mathematica: Bertrand Russell's Manuscripts and Notes for the Second Edition.Bernard Linsky - 2011 - Cambridge University Press.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
The Logic of Opacity.Andrew Bacon & Jeffrey Sanford Russell - 2019 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 99 (1):81-114.
Against the Russellian Open Future.Anders J. Schoubye & Brian Rabern - 2017 - Mind 126 (504): 1217–1237.
Quantifying In From a Fregean Perspective.Seth Yalcin - 2015 - Philosophical Review 124 (2):207-253.
References found in this work
Essays on Actions and Events: Philosophical Essays Volume 1.Donald Davidson - 1970 - Clarendon Press.
Reference and Definite Descriptions.Keith S. Donnellan - 1966 - Philosophical Review 75 (3):281-304.
Uber Sinn und Bedeutung.Gottlob Frege - 1892 - Zeitschrift für Philosophie Und Philosophische Kritik 100 (1):25-50.