Russell's notion of scope

Mind 114 (456):1005-1037 (2005)
Abstract
Despite the renown of ‘On Denoting’, much criticism has ignored or misconstrued Russell's treatment of scope, particularly in intensional, but also in extensional contexts. This has been rectified by more recent commentators, yet it remains largely unnoticed that the examples Russell gives of scope distinctions are questionable or inconsistent with his own philosophy. Nevertheless, Russell is right: scope does matter in intensional contexts. In Principia Mathematica, Russell proves a metatheorem to the effect that the scope of a single occurrence of a description in an extensional context does not matter, provided existence and uniqueness conditions are satisfied. But attempts to eliminate descriptions in more complicated cases may produce an analysis with more occurrences of descriptions than featured in the analysand. Taking alternation and negation to be primitive (as in the first edition of Principia), this can be resolved, although the proof is non-trivial. Taking the Sheffer stroke to be primitive (as proposed by Russell in the second edition), with bad choices of scope the analysis fails to terminate
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/mind/fzi1005
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,553
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
The Existence Entailments of Definite Descriptions.Paul Elbourne - 2010 - Linguistics and Philosophy 33 (1):1-10.

View all 15 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Russell's Substitutional Theory of Classes and Relations.Gregory Landini - 1987 - History and Philosophy of Logic 8 (2):171-200.
Particulars As Universals.Herbert Hochberg - 1995 - Journal of Philosophical Research 20:83-111.
Russell's Completeness Proof.Peter Milne - 2008 - History and Philosophy of Logic 29 (1):31-62.
The Loss of Uniqueness.Zoltán Gendler Szabó - 2005 - Mind 114 (456):1185 - 1222.
Descriptions and Beyond.Marga Reimer & Anne Bezuidenhout (eds.) - 2004 - Oxford University Press.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

233 ( #15,613 of 2,168,220 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

3 ( #127,274 of 2,168,220 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums