Mind 114 (456):1005-1037 (2005)

Authors
Saul Kripke
CUNY Graduate Center
Abstract
Despite the renown of ‘On Denoting’, much criticism has ignored or misconstrued Russell's treatment of scope, particularly in intensional, but also in extensional contexts. This has been rectified by more recent commentators, yet it remains largely unnoticed that the examples Russell gives of scope distinctions are questionable or inconsistent with his own philosophy. Nevertheless, Russell is right: scope does matter in intensional contexts. In Principia Mathematica, Russell proves a metatheorem to the effect that the scope of a single occurrence of a description in an extensional context does not matter, provided existence and uniqueness conditions are satisfied. But attempts to eliminate descriptions in more complicated cases may produce an analysis with more occurrences of descriptions than featured in the analysand. Taking alternation and negation to be primitive (as in the first edition of Principia), this can be resolved, although the proof is non-trivial. Taking the Sheffer stroke to be primitive (as proposed by Russell in the second edition), with bad choices of scope the analysis fails to terminate
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/mind/fzi1005
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,100
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Reference and Definite Descriptions.Keith S. Donnellan - 1966 - Philosophical Review 75 (3):281-304.
Descriptions.Stephen Neale - 1990 - MIT Press.
Frege's Puzzle. [REVIEW]Graeme Forbes - 1987 - Philosophical Review 96 (3):455.

View all 55 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Logic of Opacity.Andrew Bacon & Jeffrey Sanford Russell - 2019 - Philosophical and Phenomenological Research 99 (1):81-114.

View all 26 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Russell's Substitutional Theory of Classes and Relations.Gregory Landini - 1987 - History and Philosophy of Logic 8 (2):171-200.
The Loss of Uniqueness.Szabó Zoltán Gendler - 2005 - Mind 114 (456):1185 - 1222.
Russell's Completeness Proof.Peter Milne - 2008 - History and Philosophy of Logic 29 (1):31-62.
Particulars As Universals.Herbert Hochberg - 1995 - Journal of Philosophical Research 20:83-111.
Descriptions and Beyond.Marga Reimer & Anne Bezuidenhout (eds.) - 2004 - Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
288 ( #24,527 of 2,324,370 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
15 ( #42,200 of 2,324,370 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes